ATOMS Project AT Outcomes Bibliography
APA Format, Alphabetical by Author
Last updated: August 2006
AARP Public Policy Institute. (2003). Beyond Fifty.03: A report to the nation on independent living and disability. Washington, D. C: author.
Abdinnour-Helm, S. F., Chaparro, B. S., & Framer, S. M. (2005). Using the End-User Computing Saticsfaction (EUCS) insturment to measure satisfaction with a web site. Decision Sciences, 36(2), 341-364.
ABLEDATA. Directory of Manufacturers and Distributors. Retrieved May, 2002, from http://www.abledata.com/
ADA Compliance Guidebook: A Checklist for your Building. (1991). Washington D.C.: Building Owners and Managers Association International.
Adams, J., & Grisbrooke, J. (1998). The use of level access showers 12 months after installation. British Journal of Therapy & Rehabilitation, 5(10), 504-510.
Agnew, P. J., & Maas, F. (1995). Compliance in wearing wrist working splints in rheumatoid arthritis. unknown, 15(3), 165-.
Agree, E. M. (1999). The influence of personal care and assistive devices on the measurement of disability. Social Science & Medicine, 48(4), 427-443.
Agree, E. M., & Freedman, V. A. (2000). Incorporating assistive devices into community-based long-term care: an analysis of the potential for substitution and supplementation. Journal of Aging & Health, 12(3), 426-450.
Agree, E. M., & Freedman, V. A. (2003). A comparison of assistive technology and personal care in alleviating disability and unmet need. Gerontologist, 43(3), 335-344.
Aiello, J., & Steinfeld, E. (1979). Accessible buildings for people with severe visual impairments / prepared for U.S. Department of Housing and Urban and Development. Washington: The Office.
Algood, S. D., Cooper, R. A., Fitzgerald, S. G., Cooper, R., & Boninger, M. L. (2005). Effect of a pushrim-activated power-assist wheelchair on the functional capabilities of persons with tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 86(3), 380-386.
Allen, S. M., Foster, A., & Berg, K. (2001). Receiving help at home: The interplay of human and technological assistance. Journals of Gerontology Series B Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 56B(6), S374-382.
Alm, M., Gutierrez, E., Hultling, C., & Saraste, H. (2003). Clinical evaluation of seating in persons with complete thoracic spinal cord injury. Spinal cord : the official journal of the International Medical Society of Paraplegia, 41(10), 563-571.
American Academy of Phyical Medicine and Rehabilitation. (2003). Access to assistive technologies: Improving health and well-being for people with disabilites. Chicago: Foundation for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (June16, 2004). Assistive technology within occupational therapy practice. Retrieved August 5, 2004, from www.aota.org/members/area2/links/link38.asp
Aminzadeh, F., & Edwards, N. (1998). Exploring seniors' views on the use of assistive devices in fall prevention. Public Health Nursing, 15(4), 297-304.
Aminzadeh, F., & Edwards, N. (2000). Factors associated with cane use among community dwelling older adults. Public Health Nursing, 17(6), 474-483.
Aminzadeh, F., Edwards, N., Lockett, D., & Nair, R. C. (2000). Utilization of bathroom safety devices, patterns of bathing and toileting, and bathroom falls in a sample of community living older adults. Technology & Disability, 13(2), 95-103.
Aminzadeh, F., Plotnikoff, R., & Edwards, N. (1999). Development and evaluation of the cane use cognitive mediator instrument. Nursing Research, 48(5), 269-275.
Anderson, K. L., & Goldstein, H. (2004). Speech perception benefits of FM and infrared devices to children with hearing aids in a typical classroom. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 35(2), 169-184.
Anderson-Inman, L., Carl, D., Edyburn, D., Regan, B., & Yeh, J. (2005, November 18). The AT Field at a tipping point: Findings from NCTI's dialogue events. Paper presented at the Moderator for a Panel Discussion presented at the 2005 National Innovators Conference, National Center for Technology Innovation, Washington, DC.
Andren, E., & Grimby, G. (2004). Dependence in daily activities and life satisfaction in adult subjects with cerebral palsy or spina bifida: A follow-up study. Disability Rehabilitation, 26(9), 528-536.
Andrich, R. (2002). The SCAI instrument: Measuring costs of individual assistive technology programmes. Technology & Disability, 14, 95-99.
Andrich, R., & Besio, S. (2002). Being informed, demanding and responsible consumers of assistive technology: An educational issue. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1/2/3), 152-159.
Andrich, R., & Ferrario, M. (1996). Cost outcome analysis for assistive technology: Case studies, CERTAIN.
Andrich, R., Ferrario, M., & Moi, M. (1997). Cost-outcomes analysis in the provision of assistive technology to individual cases. In G. Anogianakis, C. Buhler & M. Soede (Eds.), Advancement of assistive technology (pp. 386-390). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS.
Andrich, R., Ferrario, M., & Moi, M. (1998). A model of cost-outcome analysis for assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation, 20(1), 1-24.
Andrich, R., Ferrario, M., Wessels, R., de Witte, L., Persson, J., Oberg, B., et al. (1998). Assessing outcomes of assistive technology products and services: The EATS instruments. ?: ?
Andrich, R., Ferrario, M., & Moi, M. (1998.). A model of cost-outcome and assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation,, 20(1,), 1-24.
Andrich, R., Ferrario, M., & Moi, M. (2000). A model of cost-outcome for assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation., 20,, 1-24.
Angelo, D. H. (2000). Impact of augmentative and alternative communication devices on families. AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 16(1), 37-47.
Angelo, D. H., Jones, S. D., & Kokoska, S. M. (1995). Family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of young children. Aac: Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 11(3), 193-202.
Angelo, D. H., Kokoska, S. M., & Jones, S. D. (1996). Family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of adolescents and young adults. Aac: Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 12(1), 13-22.
Angelo, J. (1992). Comparison of 3 computer-scanning modes as an interface method for persons with cerebral-palsy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46(3), 217-222.
Angelo, J. (1992). Comparison on three computer scanning modes as an interface method for persons with cerebral palsy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46(3), 217-222.
Angelo, J. (2000). Factors affecting the use of a single switch with assistive technology devices. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 37(5), 591-598.
Angelo, J., Buning, M., Schmeler, M., & Doster, S. (1997). Identifying best practice in the occupational therapy assistive technology evaluation: An analysis of three focus goups. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51(10), 916-920.
Angelo, J., & Trefler, E. (1998). A survey of persons who use integrated control devices. Assistive Technology, 10(2), 77-83.
Angew, P., & Maas, F. (1995). Compliance in wearing wrist working splints in rheumatoid arthritis. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 15(3), 165-180.
Annesley, A. L., Almada-Norfleet, M., Arnall, D. A., & Cornwall, M. W. (1990). Energy expenditure of ambulation using the Sure-Gait crutch and the standard axillary crutch. Physical Therapy, 70(1), 18-23.
Anson, D. (1994). Finding your way in the maze of computer access technology. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48(2), 121-129.
Anson, D., George, S., Galup, R., Shea, B., & Vetter, R. (2001). Efficiency of the Chubon versus the QWERTY keyboard. Assistive Technology, 13(1), 40-45.
Ashton-Miller, J. A., Yeh, M. W. I., Richardson, J. K., & Galloway, T. (1996). A cane reduces loss of balance in patients with peripheral neuropathy: Results from a challenging unipedal balance test. Archives of Physical Medecine and Rehabilitation, 77, 446-452.
Assistive Technology Act of 1998(1998).
Assistive Technology Outcomes Consensus Meeting. Status Report. (October, 2004). Retrieved April 19, 2005, from http://www.uwm.edu/CHS/r2d2/atoms/consensus/2004-10consensus.html
Assistive technology outcomes: Outcome measurement tools. Retrieved April 27, 2004, from www.utoronto.ca/atrc/reference/atoutcomes/ATOTools.html
Assistive technology policy and practice: What is the right thing to do? What is the reasonable thing to do? What is required and must be done? A conversation with Dr. Diane Golden. (1999). Special Education Technology Practice, 1(1), 12-14.
Assistive Technology Related Assistance to Individuals with Disabilities Act Amendments of 1994. (Vol. see "Keywords" entry to see how it was sourced somewhere else).
ATIP Project. 2004, from http://www.atip.state.oh.us
Bachschmidt, R. A., Harris, G. F., & Simoneau, G. G. (2001). Walker-assisted gait in rehabilitation: A study of biomechanics and instrumentation. IEEE Transactions Neural System Rehabilitation Engineering, 9(1), 96-105.
Backman, C. L., & Deitz, J. C. (1988). Static wrist splint: Its effect in three women with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Research, 1, 151-160.
Bain, B. (1995). Steps in a problem solving evaluation for assistive technology. Technology Special Interest Section Newsletter, 5(2), 1-3.
Bain, B. K., Block, L., & Strehlow, A. (1996). Survey report on the assessment of individuals with spinal cord injuries for assistive technology. Technology and Disability, 5, 289 - 294.
Ballinger, C., Pickering, R., Bannister, S., Gore, S., & McLellan, D. (1995). Evaluating equipment for people with disabilities: user and technical perspectives on basic commodes. Clinical Rehabilitation, 9, 157-166.
Barber, J. (1996). The design of disability products: A psychological perspective. British journal of occupational therapy, 59(12), 561-564.
Barger, A., II, Funkhouser, K. B., Gravitz, T. L., Jusko, H. A., Lokke, S. L., McCullen, L. M., et al. (2000). Potential variables affecting the use of reachers by the elderly. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 17(3), 51-66.
Barry, C. J., Smith, D., Lennarson, P., Jermeland, J., Darling, W., Stierman, L., et al. (2003). The effect of wearing a restrictive neck brace on driver performance. Neurosurgery, 53(1), 98-102.
Basford, J. R., & Allen, E. M. (1985). Adaptive equipment for C6 quadriplegia: An approach to effective, simple, and inexpensive devices. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 66(12), 829-831.
Bashford, G. M., Steele, J. R., Munro, B. J., Westcott, G., & Jones, M. E. (1998). Ejector chairs: Do they work and are they safe? Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 45(3), 99-106.
Batavia, A. J., & Hammer, G. S. (1990). Toward the development of consumer-based criteria for the evaluation of assistive devices. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 7, 425-436.
Batavia, M., Batavia, A. I., & Friedman, R. (2001). Changing chairs: Anticipating problems in prescribing wheelchairs. Disability and rehabilitation, 23(12), 539-548.
Bates, P. S., Spencer, J. C., Young, M. E., & Rintala, D. H. (1993). Assistive technolgy and the newly disabled adult: Adaptation to wheelchair use. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(11), 1014 1021.
Baxter, M. F. (2000). Mind game: People with SCI must handle psychosocial aspects of assistive technology. Advance for Directors in Rehabilitation, 9(6) , p. 63-4.
Behrman, M. (1994.). Assistive technology for students with mild disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic,, 30(2,), 70-83.
Behrmann, J. (2000). CEC helps launch national center on curriculum access. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(5), 90.
Beigel, A. R. (2000). Assistive technology assessment: More than the device. Intervention in School and Clinic, 35(4), 237-243.
Bell, P., & Hinojosa, J. (1995). Perception of the impact of assistive devices on daily life of three individuals with quadriplegia. Assistive Technology, 7(2), 87-94.
Benedict, R. E., Lee, J. P., Marrujo, S. K., & Farel, A. M. (1999). Assistive devices as an early childhood intervention: Evaluating outcomes. Technology & Disability, 11(1/2), 79-90.
Benedict, R. E., Lee, J.P., Marrujo, S.K., & Farel, A.M. (1999.). Assistive devices as an early childhood intervention: Evaluating outcomes. Technology and Disability,, 11.5, 79-90.
Bennett, D. (2000). The assessment and instructional management system: An innovative approach to evaluating the progress of students with disabilities. Educational Technology, 40, 33-36.
Bentur, N., Barnea, T., & Mizrahi, I. (1996). A follow-up study of elderly buyers of an assistive chair. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 14(3), 51-60.
Berg, K., Hines, M., & Allen, S. (2002). Wheelchair users at home: Few home modifications and many injurious falls. American Journal of Public Health, 92(1), 48.
Berry, E. T., McLaurin, S. E., & Sparling, J. W. (1996). Parent/caregiver perspectives on the use of power wheelchairs. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 8(4), 146-150.
Bestmann, A., Lingnau, M. L., Staats, M., & Hesse, S. (2001). Phasenspezifische Hilfsmittelverordnungen in der neurologischen rehabilitation. Rehabilitation, 40, 346-351.
Bonaroti, D. (1999). Head-mounted displays: are they practical for school-age children? Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 93(8), 485-497.
Bonaroti, D., Akers, J., Smith, B. T., Mulcahey, M. J., & Betz, R. R. (1999). A comparison of FES with KAFO for providing ambulation and upright mobility in a child with a complete thoracic spinal cord injury. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 22(3), 159-166.
Bonaroti, D., Akers, J. M., Smith, B. T., Mulcahey, M. J., & Betz, R. R. (1999). Comparison of functional electrical stimulation to long leg braces for upright mobility for children with complete thoracic level spinal injuries. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 80(9), 1047-1053.
Brief summary of focus group analysis January 2002-March 2002. (n.d.). from http://www.atnet.org/CR4AT/FocusGroup/4.02.Focus.Group.html
Brooks, D., King, A., Tonack, M., Simson, H., Gould, M., & Goldstein, R. (2004). User perspectives on issues that influence the quality of daily life of ventilator-assisted individuals with neuromuscular disorders. Canadian Respiratory Journal, 11(8), 547-554.
Brown, D. L. (1996). Personal implications of functional electrical stimulation standing for older adolescents with spinal cord injuries. Technology & Disability, 5(3/4), 295-311.
Buning, M. E., & Hanzlik, J. R. (1993). Adaptive Computer Use for a Person with Visual Impairment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(11), 998-1008.
Bursick, T., Trefler, E., Fitzgerald, S., & Robert, J. (2000). Wheelchair seating and positioning outcomes in the elderly nursing home population. Paper presented at the RESNA.
*Bursick, T., Trefler, E., Fitzgerald, S., & Robert, J. (2000). Wheelchair seating and positioning outcomes in the elderly nursing home population. Paper presented at the RESNA.
Bynum, H. S., & Rogers, J. C. (1987). The use and effectiveness of assistive devices possessed by patients seen in home care. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 7(3), 181-191.
Camp, M. M. (2001). The use of service dogs as an adaptive strategy: a qualitative study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(5), 509-517.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists position statement: Assistive technology and occupational therapy. (2003). Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(2) , p. 113-5.
Caudrey, D. J., & Seeger, B. (1983). Rehabilitation engineering service evaluation: A follow-up survey of device effectiveness and patient acceptance. Rehabilitation Literature, 44(3/4), 80-85.
Chamberlain, E., Evans, N., Neighbour, K., & Hughes, J. (2001). Equipment: is it the answer? An audit of equipment provision. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(12), 595-600.
Chamberlain, M. A., Thornely, G., & Wright, V. (1978). Evaluation of aids and equipment for bath and toilet. Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, 17(3), 187-194.
Chaves, E. S., Boninger, M. L., Cooper, R., Fitzgerald, S. G., Gray, D. B., & Cooper, R. A. (2004). Assessing the influence of wheelchair technology on perception of participation in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 85(11), 1854-1858.
Chen, L. P., Mann, W. C., Tomita, M. R., & Burford, T. E. (1998). An evaluation of reachers for use by older persons with disabilities. Assistive Technology, 10(2), 113-125.
Chen, T., Mann, W. C., Tomita, M., & Nochajski, S. (2000). Caregiver involvement in the use of assistive devices by frail older persons. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 20(3), 179-199.
Chen, Y. L., Chen, S. C., Chen, W. L., & Lin, J. F. (2003). A head orientated wheelchair for people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil, 25(6), 249-253.
Chen-Wing, S. L. N., Schuller, R., & Fernie, G. R. (1997). An interface to enhance mobility for people with hemispatial neglect. Assistive Technology, 9(1), 55-61.
Chiu, C. W., & W., M. D. (2004). The effect of training older adults with stroke to use home-based assistive devices. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research: Occupation, Participation and Health, 24(3), 113-120.
Chouard, C. H., Meyer, B., & Fugain, C. (1995). Clinical results for the DIGISONIC multichannel cochlear implant. Laryngoscope, 105(5 part 1), 505-509.
Chung, C., Mann, W. C., Mullick, A., & Tomita, M. (1997). Comparisons of cane handle designs for use by elders with arthritic hands. Technology & Disability, 7(3), 183-198.
Clemson, L., & Martin, R. (1996). Usage and effectiveness of rails, bathing and toilet aids. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 10, 41-59.
Consumers survey. (n.d.). Retrieved February 11, 2004, from http://www.atnet.org/CR4AT/home.html
Cooper, B. A., Letts, L., & Rigby, P. (1993). Exploring the use of color cueing on an assistive device in the home: six case studies. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 11(4), 47-59.
Cooper, B. A., & Stewart, D. (1997). The effect of a transfer device in the homes of elderly women... the STURDYGRIP Vertical Pole. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 15(2), 61-77.
Cooper, R. A., Boninger, M. L., Cooper, R., Dobson, A. R., Kessler, J., Schmeler, M., et al. (2003). Use of Independence 3000 IBOT Transporter at home and in the community. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 26(1), 79-85.
Cooper, R. A., Boninger, M. L., Cooper, R., Fitzgerald, S. G., & Kellerher, A. (2004). Preliminary assessment of a a prototype advanced mobility device in the work environment of veterans with spinal cord injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 19(2), 161-170.
Cooper, R. A., Fitzgerald, S. G., Boninger, M. L., Prins, K., Rentschler, A. J., Arva, J., et al. (2001). Evaluation of a pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 82(5), 702-708.
CORE: The Center for Outcomes Research and Education [Online] Available:http://www.uic.edu/ahp/OT/assistive.htm (August 6, 2001).
Crandall, W., Brabyn, J., Bentzen, B. L., & Myers, L. (1999). Remote infrared signage evaluation for transit stations and intersections. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 36(4), 341-355.
Crane, B. A., Holm, M. B., Hobson, D., Cooper, R. A., Reed, M. P., & Stadelmeier, S. (2004). Development of a consumer-driven Wheelchair Seating Discomfort Assessment Tool (WcS-DAT). International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 27(1), 85-90.
Creasey, G. H., Kilgore, K. L., Brown-Triolo, D. L., Dahlberg, J. E., Peckham, P. H., & Keith, M. W. (2000). Reduction of costs of disability using neuroprostheses. Assistive Technology, 12(1), 67-75.
Croser, R., Garrett, R., Seeger, B., & Davies, P. (2001). Effectiveness of electronic aids to daily living: increased independence and decreased frustration. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 48(1), 35-44.
Cushman, L. A., & Scherer, M. J. (1996). Measuring the relationship of assistive technology use, functional status over time, and consumer-therapist perceptions of ATs. Assistive Technology, 8(2), 103-109.
Cushman, L. A., & Scherer, M. J. (2002). A pilot study of perceived needs of persons with new spinal cord injury. Psychological Reports, 90(3), 1153-1160.
Dallas, M. J., & White, L. W. (1982). Clothing fasteners for women with arthritis. AJOT American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36, 515-518.
Daniels, L. E., Sparling, J. W., Reilly, M., & Humphry, R. (1995). Use of assistive technology with young children with severe and profound disabilities. Infant Toddler Intervention: the Transdisciplinary Journal, 5(1), 91-112.
Davies, A., De Souza, L. H., & Frank, A. O. (2003). Changes in the quality of life in severly disabled people following provision of powered indoor/outdoor chairs. Disability Rehabilitation, 25(6), 286-290.
Davies, D., & Kumar, S. (1996). A domestic assistive device for rheumatoid hands. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 6(2), 135-143.
Day, H. Y., Jutai, J., Woolrich, W., & Strong, G. (2001). The stability of impact of assisitve devices. Disability Rehabilitation, 23(9), 400-404.
de Jonge, D., Rodger, S., & Fitzgibbon, H. (2001). Putting technology to work: users' perspective on integrating assistive technology into the workplace. Work: a Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 16(2), 77-89.
Derosier, R., & Farber, R. S. (2005). Speech recognition software as an assistive device: a pilot study of user satisfaction and pychosocial impact. Work, 25(2), 125-134.
Diamond, M. F., & Ottenbacher, K. J. (1990). Effect of a tone-inhibiting dynamic ankle-foot orthosis on stride characteristics of an adult with hemiparesis. Physical Therapy, 70(7), 423-430.
Driscoll, M. P., Rodger, S. A., & deJonge, D. M. (2001). Factors that prevent or assist the integration of assistive technology into the workplace for people with spinal cord injuries: perspectives of the users and their employers and co-workers. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 16(1), 53-66.
Dunn, R. B., Walter, J. S. A., Lucero, Y., Weaver, F., Langbein, E., Fehr, L., et al. (1998). Follow-up assessment of standing mobility device users. Assistive Technology, 10(2), 84-93.
Durfee, J. L., & Billingsley, F. F. (1999). A comparison of two computer input devices for uppercase letter matching. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53(2), 214-220.
Dursun, E., Dursun, N., & Alican, D. (2002). Ankle-foot orthoses: effect on gait in children with cerebral palsy. Disability & Rehabilitation, 24(7), 345-347.
Eberhardt, S. P., Osborne, J., & Rahman, T. (2000). Classroom evaluation of the Arlyn Arm robotic workstation. Assistive Technology., 12(2), 132-143.
Education technology. Hearing before a subcommittee of the committee on appropriations. United States senate, one hundred seveneth congress, first session, special hearing (July 25, 2001), Senate, 1 Sess. (2002).
Edwards, N. I., & Jones, E. A. (1998). Ownership and use of assistive devices amongst older people in the community. Age & Ageing, 27(4), 463-468.
Edyburn, D. (2003, February 8). ATOMS session. Paper presented at the Presented at the Annual Technology and Media Division Conference, Reston, VA.
Edyburn, D. (2003). Measuring assistive technology outcomes in mathematics. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18(4), 76-79.
Edyburn, D. (2003). Measuring assistive technology outcomes in writing. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18(2), 60-64.
Edyburn, D. (2004). Measuring assistive technology outcomes in reading. Journal of Special Edcuaiton Technology, 19(1), 58-62.
Edyburn, D. (2004, November 11-13). What does the research say? Locating and interpreting special education technology research. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the annual Teach Education Division Conference, Albuquerque, NM.
Edyburn, D., Higgins, K., & Boone, R. E. (2005). Handbook of special education technology research and practice. Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design, Inc.
Edyburn, D., Smith, R. O., & Schwanke, T. D. (2002). An assistive technology outcomes primer. RESNA 25th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice and Policy, 121-122.
Edyburn, D., & Zabala, J. (2004, October 22). Heresy or natural evolution: Is it time to rethink assistive technology. Paper presented at the Presented at the 22nd Annual Closing the Gap Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
Edyburn, D. L. (1999). Technology integration strategies: Outcomes, standards, and technology. Closing the Gap, 18(5), 9-10, 34.
Edyburn, D. L. (2000). Collegial study groups: A strategy for creating shared visions of assistive technology outcomes. Diagnostique, 25(4), 327-348.
Edyburn, D. L. (2001). Models, theories, and frameworks: Contributions to understanding special education technology. Special Education Technology Practice, 16-24.
Edyburn, D. L. (2002). 2001 in review: A synthesis of the special education technology literature. Journal of Special Edcuaiton Technology, 17(2), 5-24.
Edyburn, D. L. (2003). 2002 in review: A synthesis of the special education technology literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18(3), 5-28.
Edyburn, D. L. (2003). Learning from text. Special Education Technology Practice, 5(2), 16-27.
Edyburn, D. L. (2003). Measuring assistive technology in mathematics. Journal of Special Edcuaiton Technology, 18(4), 27-36.
Edyburn, D. L. (2004). 2003 in review: A synthesis of the special education technology literature. Journal of Special Edcuaiton Technology, 19(4), 57-80.
Edyburn, D. L. (2004). Assisted learning: How assistive technologies developed for people with disabilities will affect learning for everyone. Threshold, 2(2), 22-25.
Edyburn, D. L. (2004, April 14-17). Assistive and instructional technology applications for students with mild disabilites. Paper presented at the Poster session presented at the annual Council for Exceptional Children Conference, New Orleans, LA.
Edyburn, D. L. (2004, January 17). Assistive and instructional technology applications for students with mild disabilities. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the Assistive Technology Industry Association Conference, Orlando, FL.
Edyburn, D. L. (2004, October 8). Assistive technology for students with learning disabilites: From consideration to outcome measurement. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the annual Council for Learning Disabilities Conference, Las Vegas, NV.
Edyburn, D. L. (2004, September 29). Assistive technology in K-12 schools: Understanding the impact of the AT consideration mandate. Paper presented at the Presented at A Roadmap for Assistive Technology to Improve Community Participation by People with Disabilites, St. Louis, MO.
Edyburn, D. L. (2004, March 14). ATOMS Project town hall meeting. Paper presented at the Presented at the Assistive Technology Industry Association, Minneapolis, MN.
Edyburn, D. L. (2004). Consumer or producer of assistive technology research: Has NCLB altered your role? Closing the Gap, 23(3), 12-13,24.
Edyburn, D. L. (2004, October 20). Measuring the impact of assistive technology and instructional technology for enhancing academic outcomes for students with disabilites. Paper presented at the Presented at the 22nd Annual Closing the Gap Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
Edyburn, D. L. (2004, January 15). New developments in assistive technology measurement outcomes research. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the Assistive Technology Industry Association Conference, Orlando, FL.
Edyburn, D. L. (2004, March 15-19). New developments in assistive technology outcomes research. Paper presented at the 2004 CSUN Technology and People with Disabilites Conference, Los Angeles, CA.
Edyburn, D. L. (2004, January 15). Special education technology research and practice. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the Assistive Technology Industry Association Conference, Orlando, FL.
Edyburn, D. L. (2004). Technology supports for differentiated instruction. Journal of Special Edcuaiton Technology, 19(2), 60-62.
Edyburn, D. L. (2005, April 14). Assistive technology and students with mild disabilities. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the ACRET Conference, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Edyburn, D. L. (2005). Assistive technology and students with mild disabilities: From consideration to outcome measurement. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins & R. E. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 239-269). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design, Inc.
Edyburn, D. L. (2005, May 3). Enhancing student achievement: Assistive technology, instructional technology, and universal design strategies. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the Annual WISCNET Conference, Madison, WI.
Edyburn, D. L. (2005, January 19-22). Evidence-based research: Short and long term implications for production adoption. Paper presented at the Presentation at the 6th Annual Assistive Technology Industry Association Conference, Orlando, FL.
Edyburn, D. L. (2005). How to read a special education technology research article. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(2), 47-49.
Edyburn, D. L. (2005, March 11). Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the 3rd Annual Connecticut Assistive Technology Conference, Cromwell, CT.
Edyburn, D. L. (2005, April 4). Reading, writing, and assistive technology. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the Annual Council for Exceptional Children Convention and Expo, Baltimore, MD.
Edyburn, D. L. (2005, March 10). The role of assistive technology in closing the achievement gap. Paper presented at the Keynote address at the 3rd Annual Connecticut Assistive Technology Conference, Cromwell, CT.
Edyburn, D. L. (2005, November 10). Special education technology research: What have we learned lately? Paper presented at the Paper presented at the 28th Annual Teacher Education Division Conference, Portland, ME.
Edyburn, D. L. (2005, April 14). What do we know about special education technology research and practice? What do we need to know? Paper presented at the Keynote presentation at ACRET conference, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Edyburn, D. L. (2005). What does the research say about....? Journal of Special Edcuaiton Technology, 20(1), 58-60.
Edyburn, D. L. (2005, January 19-22). What does the research say: Locating and interpreting special education technology research. Paper presented at the Presentation at the 6th Annual Assistive Technology Industry Association Conference, Orlando, FL.
Edyburn, D. L. (2005, March 11). What does the research say? Paper presented at the Paper presented at the 3rd Annual Connecticut Assistive Technology Conference, Cromwell, CT.
Edyburn, D. L., Fennema-Jansen, S., Hariharan, P., & Binion, M. (2005, October 21). Assistive technology outcomes measurment in the schools: Lessons learned and positive outcomes of the Ohio Assistive Technology Infusion Project. Paper presented at the Paper presented at 23rd Annual Closing the Gap Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
Edyburn, D. L., Fennema-Jansen, S., Hariharan, P., & Smith, R. (2005). Assistive technology outcomes: Implementation strategies for collecting data in the schools. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits (electronic journal), 20(2), 25-30.
Edyburn, D. L., Fennema-Jansen, S. A., Hariharan, P., & Binion, M. (2005, October 21). Assistive technology outcomes measurement in the schools: Lessons learned and positive outcomes of the Ohio Assistive Technology Infusion Project. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Closing the Gap Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
Edyburn, D. L., & Fonner, K. F. (2002, October 17). The ATOMS Project: Measuring assistive technology outcomes. Paper presented at the Presented at the 20th Annual Closing the Gap Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
Edyburn, D. L., & Smith, R. O. (2003). ATOMS Project town hall on assistive technology outcomes, Minneapolis, MN.
Edyburn, D. L., & Smith, R. O. (2003, October 18). New developments in assistive technology outcome measurement research. Paper presented at the Presented at the 21st Annual Closing the Gap Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
Edyburn, D. L., & Smith, R. O. (2004). Creating an assistive technology outcome measurement system: Validating the components. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 1(1), Online publication: http://www.atia.org/atob/ATOBV1N1/.
Edyburn, D. L., & Smith, R. O. (2004). Creating an assistive technology outcomes measurement system: Validating the components. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 1(1), 8-15.
Egilson, S. T., & Coster, W. J. (2004). School function assessment: Performance of Icelandic students with special needs. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 11, 163-170.
Einset, K., Deitz, J., Billingsley, F., & Harris, S. R. (1989). The electric feeder: An efficacy study. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 9(1), 38-52.
Eleweke, C. J., & Rodda, M. (2000). Factors contributing to parents' selection of a communication mode to use with their deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 145(4), 375-383.
Elliot, L. B., Stinson, M. S., McKee, B. G., Everhart, V. S., & Francis, P. J. (2001). College students' perceptions of the C-Print speech-to-text transcription system. Journal of Deaf Studies & Deaf Education, 6(4), 285-298.
Embleton, A. J., & Spencer, K. C. (1997). Interrater reliability of the technology team assessment process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51(4), 297-302.
Enders, A. (1988). Technology to assist physical function and aid independent living. In Proceedings of ICAART 88, the 1988 RESNA Conference, Washington, DC (pp. 568-571): RESNA.
Enders, A. (1995). The role of technology in the lives of older people. Generations, 19(1).
Enders, A. (undated). Spinal Cord Research Foundation briefing paper: Rehabilitation/technology: Daily living.Unpublished manuscript.
Enders, A., & Heumann, J. (1988). How adults with disabilites get the everyday technology they need. In Proceeding of ICAART, the 1988 RESNA Conference, Washington, DC (pp. 580-583): RESNA.
Everson, J. M., & Goodwyn, R. (1987). A comparison of the use of adaptive microswitches by students with cerebral palsy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41(11), 739-744.
Fast, A., Wang, F. S., Adrezin, R. S., Cordaro, M. A., Ramis, J., & Sosner, J. (1995). The instrumented walker: Usage patterns and forces. Archives of Physical Medecine and Rehabilitation, 76, 484-491.
Fehr, L., Langbein, W. E., & Skaar, S. B. (2000). Adequacy of power wheelchair control interfaces for persons with severe disabilities: A clinical survey. Journal of rehabilitation research and development / Veterans Administration, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Rehabilitation R&D Service, 37(3), 353-360.
Fennema-Jansen, S. (2004). Technical report-The assistive technology infustion project (ATIP) database (1.0), from http://www.uwm.edu/CHS/r2d2/atoms/archive/technicalreports/tr-atip.pdf
Fennema-Jansen, S., Smith, R. O., Edyburn, D. L., & Binion, M. (2005, June 26). Isolating the contribution of assistive technology to school progress. Paper presented at the the RESNA 28th International Conference in Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice, and Policy, Atlanta, GA.
Fennema-Jansen, S., Smith, R. O., Edyburn, D. L., & Binion, M. (2005). Isolating the contribution of assistive technology to school progress. Proceedings of the RESNA 28th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice, and Policy, Atlanta, GA.
Fennema-Jansen, S. A. (2003, August 7). Evidence at the personal level: AAC automated performance measurement. Paper presented at the Presented at the Symposium on AAC Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) and Performance Measurement, Pittsburgh, PA.
Fennema-Jansen, S. A. (2004). Technical report - The assistive technology infusion project (ATIP) database (1.0). Retrieved from the Wold Wide Web: http://www.uwm.edu/CHS/atoms/activities/.
Fennema-Jansen, S. A., Binion, M., Edyburn, D., & Smith, R. O. (2006). Making a large database available for assistive technology research. Proceedings of the RESNA 29th International Conference - Thriving in Challenging Times: The Future of Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology, Atlanta, GA.
Fennema-Jansen, S. A., & Edyburn, D. L. (2003, March 6). Launching a large-scale assistive technology service delivery and outcome tracking system in the public schools. Paper presented at the Presented at the 2003 School of Education Research Conference, Milwaukee, WI.
Fennema-Jansen, S. A., Smith, R. O., Edyburn, D., Wilson, M., & Binion, M. (2004, June 19-22). Measuring AT outcomes using the student performance profile: Analysis and recommendations. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the RESNA 27th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Reserach, Design, Practice, and Policy, Orlando, FL.
Fennema-Jansen, S. A., Smith, R. O., Edyburn, D. L., Wilson, M., & Binion, M. (2004, June 19). Measuring AT outcomes using the student performance profile: Analysis and recommendations. Paper presented at the Presented at the RESNA 27th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice, and Policy, Orlando, FL.
Ferguson-Pell, M. (1998). An age of reason for assistive technology? Assistive Technology, 10, 148-150.
Fernie, G. (1991). Assistive devices, robotocs, and quality of life in the frail elderly. In B. J. E., J. E. Lubben, J. C. Rowe & D. E. Deutchman (Eds.), The Concept and Measurement of Quality of Life in the Frail Elderly (pp. 142-167). San Diego: Academic Press.
Ferriell, B. R., Fogo, J. L., McDaniel, S. A., Schillig, L. R., Shehorn, A. R., Stringfellow, J. K., et al. (1999). Determining the effectiveness of pencil grips: An electromyographical analysis. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 12(1), 47-62.
Feys, P., Romberg, A., Ruutiainen, J., Davies-Smith, A., Jones, R., Avizzano, C. A., et al. (2001). Assistive technology to improve PC interaction for people with intention tremor. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 38(2), 234-243.
Finlayson, M., Guglielmello, L., & Liefer, K. (2001). Describing and predicting the possession of assistive devices among persons with multiple sclerosis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(5), 545-551.
Finlayson, M., & Havixbeck, K. (1992). A post-discharge study on the use of assistive devices. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(4), 201-207.
Finlayson, M., & Havixbeck, K. (1992). A post-discharge study on the use of assistve devices. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(4), 201-207.
Finn, D. (1998). An overview of the assistive technology scene in Canada. Technology and Disability, 9, 81-88.
Fitzgerald, S. G., Arva, J., Cooper, R. A., Dvorznak, M. J., Spaeth, D. M., & Boninger, M. L. (2003). A pilot study on community usage of a pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair. Assistive Technology, 15(2), 113-119.
Fitzgerald, S. G., Cooper, R. A., Zipfel, E., Spaeth, D. M., Puhlman, J., Kelleher, A., et al. (2006). The development and preliminary evaluation of a training device for wheelchair users: The GAME Wheels system. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1(1-2), 129-139.
Fitzsimmons, S. (2001). Easy Rider wheelchair biking: A nursing-recreation therapy clinical trail for the treatment of depression. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 27(5), 14-23.
Foley, M. P., Prax, B., Crowell, R., & Boone, T. (1996). Effects of assistive devices on cardiorespiratory demands in older adults. Physical Therapy, 76(12), 1313-1319.
Fonner, K. F. (2003, March 22). The ATOMS Project: Measuring assistive technology outcomes. Paper presented at the Presented at the California State University Northridge's (CSUN) 18th Annual International Conference "Technology and Persons with Disabilities", Los Angeles, CA.
Foto, M. (1996). Outcome studies: The what, why, how, and when. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50(2), 87-88.
Fox, J. A., & Johnson, D. (2000). Curriculum transformation and disability (CTAD): Helping postsecondary facutly make their classes more accessible to all student. On Workshop facilitator's guide. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, General College.
Fox, P. L. (1995). Environmental modifications in the homes of elderly Canadians with disabilities. Disability & Rehabilitation, 17(1), 43-49.
Fragala, M. A., Goodgold, S., & Dumas, H. (2003). Effects of Lower Extremity Passive Stretching: Pilot Study of Children and Youth with Severe Limitations in Self-Mobility. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 15(3), 167-175.
Fraser, B. A. (1995, March, 24, 1995). Determining device access for persons with physical disabilities. Paper presented at the Florida Assistive Technology Impact Conference and the Council for Exceptional Children Conference, Technology and Media Division, Orlando, FL.
Frieberg-Stratman, K. (1999). Examination of the task supports section of the school function assessment as measurement of assistive technology outcomes. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee.
Fuchs, R. H., & Gromak, P. A. (2003). Wheelchair use by residents of nursing homes: Effectiveness in meeting positioning and mobility needs. Assistive Technology, 15(2), 151-163.
Fuhrer, M. J. (1997). Assessing medical rehabilitation: The promise of outcomes research (Ed. ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Fuhrer, M. J. (1997). Evaluating the outcomes of assistive technologies and related services: The roles of program management-oriented and rehabilitation science-oriented outcomes research. Paper presented at the Association for the Advancement of Assistive Technology Conference, Tessaloniki, Greece.
Fuhrer, M. J. (1999). Assistive technology outcomes research: Impressions of an interested newcomer. Paper presented at the International Conference on Outcome Assessment in Assistive Technology, Oslo, Norway.
Fuhrer, M. J. (2000). Subjectifying quality of life as a medical rehabilitation outcome. Disability & Rehabilitation., 22(11), 481-489.
Fuhrer, M. J. (2001). Assistive technology outcomes research: Challenges met and yet unmet. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80(7), 528-535.
Fuhrer, M. J., Jutai, J. W., Scherer, M. J., & De Ruyter, F. (2003). A framework for the conceptual modeling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(22), 1243-1251.
Fuhrer, M. J. E. (Ed.). (1987). Rehabilitation outcomes: Analysis and measurement. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Furniss, F., & Ward, A. (1999). A palmtop-based job aid for workers with severe intellectual disabilities. Technology & Disability, 10(1), 53-67.
Gagne, J., Laplante, L., vesque, A., Labelle, M., & Doucet, K. (2002). An audiovisual-FM system (AudiSee) designed for use in classroom settings: An evaluation of the effects of visual distractions on speechreading performance. Seminars in Hearing, 23(1), 43-55.
Gallagher, P., & MacLachlan, M. (2004). The Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales and quality of life in people with lower-limb amputation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 730-736.
Galvin, J. C. (1995). Comments on DeRuyter's "Evaluating outcomes in assistive technology." Assistive Technology, 7, 12-13.
Galvin, J. C. (1997). Assistive technology: Federal policy and practice since 1982. Technology and Disability, 6, 3-15.
Galvin, J. C., & Scherer, M. J. (1996). Evaluating, selecting, and using appropriate assistive technology. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
Garber, S., R, B., & Monga, T. (2002). Wheelchair utilization and satisfaction following cerebral vascular accident. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 39(4), 521-533.
Garber, S. L., & Gregorio, T. L. (1990). Upper extremity assistive devices: Assessment of use by spinal cord-injured patients with quadriplegia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44(2), 126-131.
Gault, S. J., & Spyker, J. M. (1969). Beneficial effect of immobilization of joints in rheumatoid and related arthritides: A spling study using sequential analysis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 12(1), 34-44.
Gauthier-Gagnon, C., Grise, M., & Potvin, D. (1999). Enabling factors related to prosthetic use by people with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 80(6), 706-713.
Geiger, C. M. (1990). The utilization of assistive devices by patients discharged from an acute rehabilitation setting. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 9(1), 3-25.
Gelderblom, G. J., & de Witte, L.P. (2002). Introduction to the special issue: the assessment of assistive technology outcomes, effects and costs. Technology and Disability,, 14(3,), 89-145.
Gelderblom, G. J., & de Witte, L. P. (2002). The assessment of assistive technology outcomes, effects and costs. Technology and Disability, 14, 91-94.
George, J., Binns, V. E., Clayden, A. D., & Mulley, G. P. (1988). Aids and adaptations for the elderly at home: underprovided, underused and undermaintained. British Medical Journal, 296, 1365-1366.
Geruschat, D. R., Deremeik, J. T., & Whited, S. S. (1999). Head-mounted displays: Are they practical for school-age children? Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 93(8), 485-497.
Geyer, M. J., Brienza, D. M., Karg, P., Trefler, E., & Kelsey, S. (2001). A randomized control trial to evaluate pressure-reducing seat cushions for elderly wheelchair users. Advances in Skin and Wound Care, 14(3), 120-132.
Gill, T. M., Richardson, E. D., & Tinetti, M. E. (1995). Evaluating the risk of dependence in activities of daily living among community-living older adults with mild to moderate cognitive impairment. Journal of Gerontology, 50(5), M235-241.
Gill, T. M., Robinson, J. T., & Tinetti, M. E. (1997). Predictors of recovery in activities of daily living among disabled older persons living in the community. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 12(12), 757-762.
Gill, T. M., Robinson, J. T., & Tinetti, M. E. (1998). Difficulty and dependence: Two components of the disability continuum among community-living older persons. Annals of Internal Medicine, 128(2), 96-101.
Gill, T. M., Robinson, J. T., Williams, C. S., & Tinetti, M. E. (1999). Mismatches between the home environment and physical capabilities among community-living older persons. Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 47, 88-92.
Gill, T. M., Williams, C. S., Mendes de Leon, C. F., & Tinetti, M. E. (1997). The role of change in physical performance in determining risk for dependence in activities of daily living among nondisabled community-living elderly persons. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 765-772.
Gill, T. M., Williams, C. S., Robison, J. T., & Tinetti, M. E. (1999). A population-based study of environmental hazards in the homes of older persons. American Journal of Public Health, 89(4), 553-556.
Gill, T. M., Williams, C. S., & Tinetti, M. E. (1999). The combined effects of baseline vulnerability and acute hospital events on the development of functional dependence among community-living older persons. Journal of Gerontology, 54(7), M377-383.
Gitlin, L. (1998). From hosptal to home: Individual variations in experience with assistive devices among older adults. In D. B. Gray, L. A. Quatrano & M. L. Lieberman (Eds.), Designing and using assistive technology (pp. 117-135). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Gitlin, L. N. (1995). Why older peple accept or reject assistive technology. Generations, 19, 41-47.
Gitlin, L. N., & Burgh, D. (1995). Issuing assistive devices to older patients in rehabilitation: an exploratory study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(10) , p. 994-1000.
Gitlin, L. N., Corcoran, M., & Leinmiller-Eckhardt, S. (1995). Understanding the family perspective: An ethnographic framework for providing occupational therapy in the home. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(3), 802-809.
Gitlin, L. N., Corcoran, M., Winter, L., Boyce, A., & Hauck, W. W. (2001). A randomized controlled trial of a home environmental intervention: Effect on efficacy and upset in caregivers and on daily function of persons with dementia. Gerontologist, 41(1), 4-14.
Gitlin, L. N., Levine, R., & Geiger, C. (1993). Adaptive device use by older adults with mixed disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 74(2), 149-152.
Gitlin, L. N., Luborsky, M. R., & Schemm, R. L. (1998). Emerging concerns of older stroke patients about assistive device use. The Gerontologist, 38(2), 169-180.
Gitlin, L. N., Mann, W., Tomit, M., & Marcus, S. M. (2001). Factors associated with home environmental problems among community-living older people. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23(17), 777-787.
Gitlin, L. N., Miller, K. S., & Boyce, A. (1999). Bathroom modifications for frail elderly renters: Outcomes of a community-based program. Technology & Disability, 10(3), 141-149.
Gitlin, L. N., Schemm, R. L., Landsberg, L., & Burgh, D. (1996). Factors predicting assistive device use in the home by older people following rehabilitation. Journal of Aging and Health, 8(4), 554-575.
Gitlin, L. N., Schinfeld, S., Winter, L., Corcoran, M., Boyce, A. A., & Hauck, W. (2002). Evaluating home environments of persons with dementia: Interrater reliability and validity of the Home Environmental Assesment Protocol (HEAP). Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1/2/3), 59-71.
Goldberg, L. (1999). Making learning accessible. Exceptional Parent, 29(11), 34-40.
Goldberg, L. B., & O'Neill, L. M. (2000). Computer technology can empower students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Parent, 30, 72-74.
Goldsheyder, D., Nordin, M., & Loebl, D. (2000). Enhancing the quality of life of a client with severe developmental disabilities through the application of assistive technology. A case study. Work: a Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 15(3), 167-176.
Goldstein, D. N., Cohn, E., & Coster, W. (2004). Enhancing participation for children with disabilities: Application of the ICF enablement framework to pediatric physical therapist practice. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 16, 114-120.
Goldstein, G., Beers, S. R., Shemansky, W. J., & Longmore, S. (1998). An assistive device for persons with severe amnesia. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 35(2), 238-244.
Goldstein, L. F. (2003). Special ed. tech. sparks ideas. Education Week, 22(35), 27-29.
Goodman, G., Tiene, D., & Luft, P. (2002). Adoption of assistive technology for computer access among college students with disabilities. Disability & Rehabilitation, 24(1/2/3), 80-92.
Gorman, A. J. (1997, 54). The 15% solution: Libraries and learning disabilities. American Libraries, 27, 52.
Gosman-Hedström, G., Claesson, L., & Blomstrand, C. (2002). Assistive devices in elderly people after stroke:
A longitudinal, randomized study - The Göteborg 70+ Stroke Study. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 9, 109-118.
Gottlieb, A. S., & Bakheit, A. M. (2000). Providing low-tech assistive equipment through home care services: The Massachusetts Assistive Equipment Demonstration. Technology and Disability, 13, 41-53.
Gottlieb, A. S., & Caro, F. G. (2000). Providing low-tech assistive equipment through home care services: The Massachusetts Assistive Equipment Demonstration. Technology & Disability, 13(1), 41-53.
Gradel, K. (1991). Customer service: What is its place in assistive technology and employment services? Vocational Rehabilitation, 41-54.
Gray, D., Quatrano, L., & Lieberman, M. (1998). Designing and using assistive technology: The human perspective. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Gray, D. B., & Hendershot, G. E. (2000). The ICIDH-2: Developments for a New Era of Outcomes Research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(2), S10 - S14.
Gray, D. B., Morgan, K.A., & Hollingsworth, H.H. (2001). Independent living and assistive technology: Work context. Rehabilitation Education,, 15(4,), 353-364.
Gray, J. M. (2001). Discussion of the ICIDH-2 in relation to occupational therapy and occupational science. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 8, 19-30.
Green, R. A., & Gillespie, D. N. (2001). Assistive technologies in academic libraries: A preliminary study. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 1(3), 329-337.
Greiner, B. M., Czerniecki, J. M., & Deitz, J. C. (1993). Gait parameters of children with spastic diplegia: A comparison of effects of posterior and anterior walkers. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 381-385.
Grevelding, P., & Bohannon, R. W. (2001). Reduced push forces accompany device use during sliding transfers of seated subjects. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 38(1), 135-139.
Griffith, D. (1990). Computer access for persons who are blind or visually impaired: Human factors issues. Human Factors, 32(4), 467-475.
Grisbrooke, J. (2003). Living with lifts: A study of users' experiences. British Journal of Therapy & Rehabilitation, 10(2), 76-81.
Grishbrooke, J. (2003). Living with lifts: A study of users' experiences. British Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 10(2), 76-81.
Gryfe, P., & Jutai, J. (1998). Assistive technologies: Clients' perceptions of impact on quality of life. Rehab Community Care Management, 26-27, 30.
Guerette, P., & Sumi, E. (1994). Integrating control of multiple assistive devices: A retrospective review. Assistive Technology, 6(1), 67-76.
Guerette, P. J., & Nakai, R. J. (1996). Access to assistive technology: A comparison of integrated and distributed control. Technology & Disability, 5(1), 63-73.
The Guide to ABLEDATA Indexing Terms. (2004). Silver Spring, Maryland: Macro International, Inc.
Guidelines to address the needs of older persons and people with disabilities when developing standards. (2001). Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization For Standardization
International Electrotechnical Commission.
Gutierrez, B., Joffee, E., Luxton-Gourgey, K., Landau, S., & Gupta, K. M. (1997). Evaluation of a prototype talking directory display system (TDDS) in an inter-modal transit facility. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 91(6), 590-593.
Gutman, S. A. (2000). Using a computer as an environmental facilitator to promote post-head injury social role resumption: a case report. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 15(2), 71-90.
Hall, C. D., & Jensen, J. L. (2004). The effect of cane use on the compensatory step following posterior perturbations. Clinical Biomechanics, 19(7), 678-687.
Hall, M., Vanderheiden, G., & Thompson, C. (1989). ABLEDATA and hyper-ABLEDATA. Assistive Technology, 1(4), 107-111.
Hammel, J. (1996). What's the outcome? Multiple variables complicate measurement of assistive technology outcome. REHAB Management, February/March, 97-99.
Hammel, J. (1996). What's the outcome? Multiple variables complicate the measurement of assistive technology outcomes. REHAB management, 9(2), 97-99.
Hammel, J. (2000). Assistive technology and environmental intervention (AT-EI) impact on activity and life roles of aging adults with developmental disabilities: Finding and implications for practice. Journal of Occupational and Physical Therapy in Geriatrics, 18(1).
Hammel, J. (2003). Technology and the environment: Supportive resource or barrier for people with developmental disabilities? Nursing Clinics of North America, 38(2), 331-349.
Hammel, J., Hall, K., Lees, D., & al., e. (1992). Clinical evaluation of a desktop robotic assistant. Journal of Rehabilitation Research Development, 26, 1-16.
Hammel, J., Lai, J.-S., & Heller, T. (2002). The impact of assistive technology and environmental interventions on function and living situation status with people who are ageing with developmental disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1/2/3), 93-105.
Hammel, J. M., Vanderloos, H. F. M., & Perkash, I. (1992). Evaluation of a vocational robot with a quadriplegic employee. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73(7), 683-693.
Handley-More, D., Deitz, J., Billingsley, F. F., & Coggins, T. E. (2003). Facilitating written work using computer word processing and word prediction. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(2), 139-151.
Hansen, R., Tresse, S., & Gunnarsson, R. K. (2004). Fewer accidents and better maintenance with active wheelchair check-ups: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18(6), 631-639.
Happ, M. B., Roesch, T. K., & Garrett, K. (2004). Electronic voice-output communication aids for temporarily nonspeaking patients in a medical intensive care unit: A feasibility study. Heart & Lung, 33(2), 92-101.
Harac, L. (2004). A level playing field. Teacher Magazine, 16(2), 40-45.
Harmer, J., & Bakheit, A. M. O. (1999). The benefits of environmental control systems as perceived by disabled users and their carers. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(9), 394-398.
Harmer, J., & Bakheit, A. M. O. (1999). The benefits of environmental control systems as perceived by disabled users and their carers`. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(9), 395-398.
Harris, F. (2004). Technical report - Qualitative research discussions, April 29, 2003 (1.0). University of Wisconsin Milwaukee. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.uwm.edu/CHS/atoms/archive/technicalreports/tr-qualitative.html.
Harris, F., & Sprigle, S. (2003). Cost analyses in assistive technology research. Assistive Technology, 15(1), 16-27.
Harris, F., & Sprigle, S. (2005). Cost analysis of an AT service delivery program. Proceedings of the RESNA 28th International Conference in Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice, and Policy.
Harris, F., & Sprigle, S. (2005, June26). Cost analysis of an AT service delivery program. Paper presented at the the RESNA 28th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice, and Policy, Atlanta, GA.
Harris, F. H. (2004, June 21). The relevance of qualitative research to AT outcome research goals. Paper presented at the Presented at the RESNA 27th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice, and Policy, Orlando, FL.
Harrison, A., Derwent, G., Enticknap, A., Rose, F. D., & Attree, E. A. (2002). The role of virtual reality technology in the assessment and training of inexperienced powered wheelchair users. Disability & Rehabilitation, 24(11-12), 599-606.
Hartke, R. J., Prohaska, T. R., & Furner, S. E. (1998). Older adults and assistive devices. Journal of Aging & Health, 10(1), 99-116.
Harwin, W. S. Niche product design: A new model for assistive technology. Reading, England: University of Reading.
Hasdai, A., Jessel, A. S., & Weiss, P. L. (1998). Use of a computer simulator for training children with disabilities in the operation of a powered wheelchair. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(3), 215-220.
Hass, U., Andersson, A., Brodin, H., & Persson, J. (1997). Assessment of Computer-aided assistive technology: Analysis of outcomes and costs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 125-135.
Hass, U., Brodin, H., Andersson, A., & Persson, J. (1997). Assistive technology selection: A study of participation of users with rheumatoid arthritis. IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering, 5(3), 263-275.
Hass, U., Freden-Karlsson, I., & Persson, J. (1996). Assistive technologies in stroke rehabilitation from a user perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 10(2), 75-80.
Haugen, K. (2005). Learning materials for children of all abilities: Begin with Universal Design. Exchange, 161, 45-48.
Hawkins, D. B. (1984). Comparisons of speech recognition in noise by mildly to moderately hearing impaired children using hearing aids and FM systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 409-418.
Haworth, R. J. (1983). Use of aids during the first 3 months after total hip replacement. British Journal of Rheumatology, 22(1), 29-35.
Haworth, R. J., & Hopkins, J. (1980). Use of aids following total hip replacement. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 398-400.
Hayes, M. (2000). Reports on assistive technology financial loan programs (Reports-Research (143)). Arlington, VA: RESNA: Association for the Advancement of Rehabilitation Technology.
Heaton, J., & Bamford, C. (2001). Assessing the outcomes of equipment and adaptations: Issues and approaches. British Journal of Occupational Therapy,, 80(7,), 528-535.
Heaton, J., & Bamford, C. (2000). Assessing the outcomes of equipment and adaptations: Volume I: A literature review. Working paper number 1726. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
Heaton, J., & Bamford, C. (2001). Assessing the outcomes of equipment and adaptations: Issues and approaches. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(7), 346-356.
Heier, S. J., & Smith, R. O. (2002). A comparison of assistive technology expertise across urban, suburban and rural Wisconsin districts. RESNA 25th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice and Policy, 195-197.
Heller, J. (1998). The future is now. Rehab Management, 108-111.
Hermann, R. P., Phalangas, A. C., Mahoney, R. M., & Alexander, M. A. (1999). Powered feeding devices: An evaluation of three models. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 80(10), 1237-1242.
Hesse, S., Gahein-Sama, A. L., & Mauritz, K. H. (1996). Technical aids in hemiparetic patients: Prescription, costs, and usage. Clinical Rehabilitation, 10, 328-333.
Hesse, S., Gahein-Sama, A. L., & Mauritz, K.-H. (1996). Technical aids in hemiparetic patients: prescription, costs and usage. Clinical Rehabilitation, 10, 328-333.
Hesse, S., & Uhlenbrock, D. (2000). A mechanized gait trainer for restoration of gait. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37(6).
Hetzroni, O. E., & Shrieber, B. (2004). Word processing as an assistive technology tool for enhancing academic outcomes of students with writing disabilities in the general classroom. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 143-154.
Higbee, J. L. (2001). Implications of universal instructional design for developmental education. Research and teaching in Developmental Education, 17(2), 67-70.
Higgins, E., & Doe, T. (n.d.). Assistive technology and the health of persons with disabilities. Retrieved February 11, 2004, from http://www.atnet.org/CR4AT/FocusGroup/HealthThematic.html
Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (1995). Compensatory effectiveness of speech recognition on the written composition of performance of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 159-174.
Higgins, K., Boone, R., & Williams, D.L. (2000). Evaluating educational software for special education. Intervention in School and Clinic, 36(2), 109-115.
Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8-17.
Hitchcock, C., & Stahl, S. (2003). Assistive technology, universal design, universal design for learning: Improved learning opportunities. Journal of Special Edcuaiton Technology, 18(4), 45-52.
Hobson, D. A. (1996). RESNA: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Assistive Technology, 8(2), 131-143.
Hocking, C. (1999). Function or feelings: Factors in abandonment of assistive devices. Technology and Disability, 11(1/2) , p. 3-11.
Hoenig, H., Taylor, D. H., & Sloan, F. A. (2003). Does assistive technology substitute for personal assistance among the disabled elderly? American Journal of Public Health, 93(2), 330-337.
Hoeppner, S. C., & Rimmer, J. H. (2000). Postural balance and self-reported exercise in older adults. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17(1), 69-77.
Holder, C. G., Haskvitz, E. M., & Weltman, A. (1993). The effects of assistive devices on the oxygen cost, cardiovascular stress, and perception of nonweight-bearing ambulation. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 18(4), 537-542.
Holland, A. (1980). Communicative abilities in daily living. Baltimore:: University Park Press.
Holliday, P. J., Mihailidis, A., Rolfson, R., & Fernie, G. (2005). Understanding and measuring powered wheelchair mobility and manoeuvrability. Part I. Reach in confined spaces. Disabil Rehabil, 27(16), 939-949.
Holliday, P. J., Topper, A. K., & Fernie, G. R. (1996). Communication tools to enhance user involvement in assistive technology design: A pilot study. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 9(3), 137-145.
Hollings, E. M., & Haworth, R. J. (1978). Supply and use of aids and appliances. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41, 336-339.
Holme, S. A., Kanny, E. M., Guthrie, M. R., & Johnson, K. L. (1997). The use of environmental control units by occupational therapists in spinal cord injury and disease services. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51(1), 42-48.
Huck, J., & Bonhotal, B. H. (1997). Fastener systems on apparel for hemiplegic stroke victims. Applied Ergonomics, 28(4), 277-282.
Hulme, J. B., Poor, R., & Schulein, M. (1983). Perceived behavioral changes observed with adaptive seating devices and training programs for multihandicapped, developmentally disabled individuals. Physical Therapy, 63(2), 205-208.
Hulme, J. B., Shaver, J., Acher, S., Mullette, L., & Eggert, C. (1987). Effects of adaptive seating devices on the eating and drinking of children with multiple handicaps. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41(2), 81-89.
InfoUse. (1999). Access to disability data: Chartbook table of contents. Retrieved June 2, 2003
InfoUse. (2003). AT Data: Assistive technology data collection project, from http://www.infouse.com/atdata/csun_index.html
Institute of Medicine. (1997). Enabling America: Assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. Washington, DC.
Irvine, B., & Siegel, J. D. (1990). Product comparison and evaluation: Canes, crutches, and walkers. In Request Evaluating Assistive Technology. Washington, DC: ECRI.
Isabelle, S., Bessey, S. F., Dragas, K.L., & Blease, P. et al. (2002.). Assistive technology for children with disabilities. Occupational therapy in Health Care,, 16(4,), 29-51.
Izzo, M. V., Hertzfeld, J. E., & Aaron, J. H. (2001). Raising the bar: Student self-determination + good teaching = success. The Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 24(1), 26-36.
Jacobs, P., Hailey, D., & Jones, A. (2003). Economic evaluation for assistive technology policy decisions. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 14(2), 119-125.
Jans, L. (2000). Use of assistive technology: Findings from national surveys.
Jedeloo, S., de Witte, L., Linssen, B., & Schrijvers, G. (2000). Satisfaction with and use of assistive devices and services for outdoor mobility. Technology & Disability, 13(3), 173-181.
Jedeloo, S., de Witte, L., & Schrijvers, G. (2002). A user-centered approach to assess the effectiveness of outdoor mobility devices and services. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 25(2), 137-141.
Jedeloo, S., De Witte, L. P., Linssen B, & Schrijvers, A. (2002). Rehabilitation in practice. Client satisfaction with service delivery of assistive technology for outdoor mobility. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(10), 550-557.
Jedeloo, S., De Witte, L. P., Linssen, B. A. J., & Schrijvers, A. J. P. (2002). Client satisfaction with service delivery of assistive technology for outdoor mobility. Rehabilitation in Practice, 24(10), 550-557.
Jedeloo, S., de Witte, L., Linssen, B. & Schrijvers, G. (2000). Satisfaction with and use of assistive devices and services for outdoor mobility. Technology & Disability, 13(3), 173-181.
Jeffs, T., Wissick, C. A., Lowrey, A., Edyburn, D., Behrmann, M., & Bausch, M. (2005, November 9). Tips and tricks in using technology to face challenges and opportunities of the new era for teaching, research, and service. Paper presented at the Preconference workshop presented at the 28th Annual Teaching Education Division Conference, Portland, ME.
Jerram, J. C. K., & Purdy, S. C. (2001). Technology, expectations, and adjustment to hearing loss: Predictors of hearing aid outcome. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 12(2), 64-79.
Jette, A. M., & Haley, S. M. (2005). Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, 339-345.
Jette, A. M., & Keysor, J. J. (2002). Use of evidence in disability outcomes and effectiveness research: Evidence of what? Milbank Quarterly, 80, 325-345.
Joerger, T. F. (2003). Risk of falling: The relationship between assistive technology use and the quality and speed of gait. Unpublished master's, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee.
Johnson, M., Smith, R. O., Walton, T., Wisneski, K., & Rust, K. L. (2005, June 26). Clinical implications of learned non-use for robotic therapy environments. Paper presented at the Presented at the RESNA 28th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice, and Policy, Atlanta, GA.
Johnson, M., Wisneski, K., Minakata, K., Hermsen, A., Smith, R. O., Walton, T., et al. (2005, June 28-July 1). Kinematic implications of learned non-use for robotic therapy. Paper presented at the Presented at the IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics: Frontiers of the Human-Machine Interface, Chicago, ILL.
Johnson, M. J., Wisneski, K., Hermsen, A., Smith, R. O., Walton, T., Hingtgen, B., et al. (2005, June28-July 1). Kinematic implications of learned non-use for robotic therapy. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ICORR IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics Frontiers of the Human-Machine Interface, Chicago, ILL.
Johnson, R. G. (1998). Measuring the impact of adaptations to the home for people with a physical disability: A pilot study using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Salford: Department of Rehabilitation, University of Salford.
Johnston, M. V., Stineman, M., & Velozo, C. A. (1997). Outcomes research in medical rehabilitation: Foundations from the past and directions for the future. In M. J. Fuhrer (Ed.), Assessing Medical Rehabilitation Practices: The Promise of Outcomes Research (pp. xxi, 469). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Jonah Eleweke, C., & Rodda, M. (2000). Factors contributing to parents' selection of a communication mode to use with their deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 145(4), 375-383.
Jones, M. L., & Sanford, J. A. (1996). People with mobility impairments in the United States today and in 2010. Assistive Technology, 8(1), 43-53.
Jongenelis, A. P. J. M., & Wiedemann, W. (1997). A comparison of plaque removal effectiveness of an electric versus a manual toothbrush in children. Journal of Dentistry for Children, 64(2), 176-182.
Joyce, B. M., & Kirby, R. L. (1991). Canes, crutches, and walkers. American Family Physician, 34(3), 535-542.
Judge, S. (2002). Family-centered assistive technology assessment and intervention practices for early intervention. Infants and Young Children, 15(1), 60-68.
Julnes, R. E., & Brown, S. E. (1993). The legal mandate to provide assistive technology in special education programming. West's Education Law Quarterly, 2(4), 552-563.
Jutai, J. (1999). Quality of life impact of assistive technology. Rehabilitation Engineering, 14(1), 2-7.
Jutai, J., & Day, H. (2002). Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS). Technology & Disability, 14, 107-111.
Jutai, J., Fuhrer, M., Demers, L., Scherer, M., & DeRuyter, F. (in press, 2005). Toward a taxonomy of assistive technology device outcomes. American Journal of Physcial Medicine and Rehabilitation.
Jutai, J., & Gryfe, P. (1998). Impacts of assistive technology on clients with ALS. Paper presented at the RESNA 1998.
Jutai, J., Ladak, N., Schuller, R., Naumann, S., & Wright, V. (1996). Outcomes measurement of assistive technologies: An institutional case study. Assistive Technology, 8(2), 110-120.
Jutai, J., Ladak, Nizar. M.H.Sc., Schuller, Reinhard. M.Sc. (1996). Outcomes measurement of assistive technologies: An institutional case study. Assistive Technology, 8,(2,), 110-120.
Jutai, J., Rigby, P., Ryan, S., & Stickel, S. (2000). Psychosocial impact of electronic aids to daily living. Assistive Technology, 12(2), 123-131.
Jutai, J. W. (2002). Occupational therapy and assistive technology: The challenge. Israel Journal of Occupational Therapy, 11(2), 110-120.
Kachourbos, M. J., & Creasey, G. H. (2000). Health promotion in motion: Improving quality of life for persons with neurogenic bladder and bowel using assistive technology [corrected] [published erratum appears in SCI NURS 2000 Winter; 17(4): 221]. Sci Nursing, 17(3), 125-129.
Kambeyanda, D., Singer, L., & Cronk, S. (1997). Potential problems associated with use of speech recognition products. Assistive Technology, 9(2), 95-101.
Kaminker, M. (1999). School based physical therapy for a child with meckel-gruber syndrome. Physical Therapy Case Reports, 2(5), 188-194.
Kane, R. (1997). Understanding health care outcomes research: Aspen.
Kanny, E., Anson, D., & Smith, R. O. (1991). Technology training for occupational therapists: A survey of entry-level curricula. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 11(5), 311-319.
Kaplan, L. I., Grynbaum, B. B., Rusk, H. A., Anastasia, T., & Gassler, S. (1966). A reappraisal of braces and other mechanical aids in patients with spinal cord dsyfunction: results of a follow-up study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 47, 395-405.
Kaplan, M. (2003). Tailor-made support. Principal Leadership, 4(2), 60-64.
Karpman, R. R. (1992). Problems and pitfalls with assistive devices. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 8(2), 1-5.
Kathy M. Suzuki, M., & Ginger Lockette, P. (2000). Client satisfactory survey of a wheelchair seating clinic. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 17, 55-65.
Keating, W., McLean, D., & Quinsey, K. (1989). Survey of appropriate provision and usage of prescribed equipment- the client's perspective. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 36, 131-135.
Keefe, B., Scherer, M., & McKee, B. G. (1996). Mainepoint: Outcomes of teaching American sign language via distance learning. Technology & Disability, 5, 319-326.
Kennedy, M. (2003). Accessibility. American School & University, 76(2), 18.
Kennedy, M. D. (1999). Assessing communication in children with psychiatric and communication disorders. Language Disorders, 8(1), 113 - 135.
Kerrigan, A. J. (1997). The psychosocial impact of rehabilitation technology. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: State of the Art Reviews, 11, 239-252.
Kilgore, K., Scherer, M., Bobblitt, R., Dettloff, J., Dombrowski, D., Godbold, N., et al. (2001). Neuroprosthesis consumers' forum: Consumer priorities for research directions. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 38(6), 655-660.
Kilkens, O. J., Post, M. W., Dallmeijer, A. J., Seelen, H. A., & van der Woude, L. H. (2003). Wheelchair skills tests: A systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17(4), 418-430.
King, G., McDougall, J., Tucker, M., Gritzan, J., Malloy-Miller, T., Alambets, P., et al. (1999). An evaluation of functional, school-based therapy services for children with special needs. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 19(2), 5-29.
King, G. A., Cathers, T., Polgar, J. M., MacKinnon, E., & Havens, L. (2000). Success in life for older adolescents with cerebral palsy. Qualitative Health Research, 10(6), 734 - 749.
King, P. M. (1998). Sourcebook of occupational rehabilitation. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
King, P. M. (Unknown). Appendix Work: Principles and Practice. In Unknown (Ed.), Outcomes Measurement in Work Programs. Unknown: American Occupational Therapy Association.
Kirby, R. L., & Ackroyd-Stolarz, S. A. (1995). Wheelchair safety: Adverse reports to the United States food and drug administration. American Journal of Physcial Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74(4), 308-312.
Kirby, R. L., Ackroyd-Stolarz, S. A., Brown, M. G., Kirkland, S. A., & MacLeod, D. A. (1994). Wheelchair-related accidents caused by tips and falls among noninstitutionalized users of manually propelled wheelchairs in Nova Scotia. American Journal of Physcial Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73(5), 319-329.
Kirby, R. L., Atkinson, S. M., & MacKay, E. A. (1989). Static and dynamic forward stability of occupied wheelchairs: Influence of elevated footrests and forward stabilizers. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 70, 681-685.
Kirby, R. L., Kumbhare, D. A., & MacLeod, D. A. (1989). "Bedside" test of static rear stability of occupied wheelchairs. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 70, 241-243.
Kirby, R. L., McLean, A. D., & Eastwood, B. J. (1992). Influence of caster diameter on the static and dynamic forward stability of occupied wheelchairs. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 73, 73-77.
Kirby, R. L., Swuste, J., Dupuis, D. J., McLeod, D. A., & Monroe, R. (2001, in press). Wheelchair Skills Test: Pilot study of a new outcome measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
Kirby, R. L., Thoren, F. A. V., Ashton, B. D., & Ackroyd-Stolarz, S. A. (1994). Wheelchair stability and maneuverability: Effect of varying the horizontal and vertical position of a rear-antitip device. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 75, 525-535.
Kirkland, C. E. (1999). Evaluation of captioning features to inform development of digital television captioning capabilities. American Annals of the Deaf, 144(3), 250-260.
Kirschner, K. L. (2001). Ethical implications of outcomes research. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 392-399.
Kittel, A., Di Marco, A. D., & Stewart, H. (2002). Factors influencing the decision to abandon manual wheelchairs for three individuals with a spinal cord injury. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, 106-114.
Klinger, L., & Spaulding, S. J. (2001). Occupational therapy treatment of chronic pain and use of assistive devices in older adults. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 16(3), 34-44.
Klint Edlund, C., Harms-Ringdahl, K., & Seiger, A. (1998). Lift/transfer and technical aids for persons with severe acquired brain injury: An inventory of problems. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 12(3), 154-159.
Knitter, C. A., Tobianski, G. E., Smith, R. O., & Schwanke, T. D. (2001, June 22-26). The WEBAUDIT as a screening and diagnostic instrument for human review of websites. Paper presented at the The AT Odyssey Continues, Reno, Nevada.
Koester, H. H. (2004). Usage, performance, and satisfaction outcomes for experienced users of automatic speech recognition. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 41(5), 739-754.
Kohn, J., LeBlanc, M., & Mortola, P. (1994). Measuring quality and performance of assistive technology: Results of a prospective monitoring program. Assistive Technology, 6(2), 120-125.
Kohn, J. G., Enders, S., & Preston Jr., J. (1983). Provision of assistive equipment for handicapped persons. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 64, 378-381.
Kohn, J. G., Mortola, P., & LeBlanc, M. (1991). Clinicl trials and quality control: Checkpoints in the provision of assistive technology. Assistive Technology, 3, 67 74.
Kohn, J. G., Mortola, P., & LeBlanc, M. (1992). Clinical trials and quality control: checkpoints in the provision of assistive technology. Assistive Technology, 3(2), 67-74.
Koppenhaver, D. A., Erickson, K. A., Harris, B., McLellan, J., Skotko, B. G., & Newton, R. A. (2001). Storybook-based communication intervention for girls with Rett syndrome and their mothers. Disability & Rehabilitation, 23(3/4), 149-159.
Kotler, A., & Tam, C. (2000). Effectiveness of Using Discrete Utterance Speech Recognition Software. Paper presented at the The Tri-joint Congress 2000, "Forging Ahead Together", Toronto, ON.
Kotler, A., & Tam, C. (2002). Effectiveness of using discrete utterance speech recognition software. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 137-144.
Koul, R. K., & Schlosser, R. W. (2004). Effects of synthetic speech output in the learning of graphic symbols of varied iconicity. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(21-22), 1278-1285.
Krass, A. E. (1997). Technology transfer: One manufacturer's perspective. Technology and Disability, 7(1.2), 55-62.
Kratz, G., Soderback, I., Guidetti, S., Hultling, C., Rykatkin, T., & Soderstrom, M. (1997). Wheelchair users' experience of non-adapted and adapted clothes during sailing, quad rugby or wheel-walking. Disability and rehabilitation, 19(1), 26-34.
Krebs, H. I., Volpe, B. T., Aisen, M. L., & Hogan, N. (1999). Robotic applications in neuromotor rehabilitation. Top Spinal Cord Injuries Rehabilitation, 5(3), 50 - 63.
Kronlof, G. H., & Sonn, U. (1999). Elderly women's way of relating to assistive devices. Technology & Disability, 10(3), 161-168.
Kuhn, M. (2002). Optical time-domain evesdropping risks of CRT displays. Paper presented at the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Berkeley, CA.
Kumar, R., Roe, M. C., & Scremin, O. U. (1995). Methods for estimating the proper length of a cane. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 76(12), 1173-1175.
La Buda, D. R. (1988). Assistive technology for older adults: Funding resources and delivery systems. In Proceedings of ICAART 88, the 1988 RESNA Conference, Washington, DC (pp. 572-575): RESNA.
La Grow, S. (1999). The use of the Sonic Pathfinder as a secondary mobility aid for travel in business environments: a single-subject design. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 36(4), 333-340.
Lacey, G., & MacNamara, S. (2000). User involvement in the design and evaluation of a smart mobility aid. Retrieved 6, 37, from www.vard.org/jour/00/37/6/lacey376.htm
Lacoste, M., Weiss-Lambrou, R., Allard, M., & Dansereau, J. (2003). Powered tilt/recline systems: Why and how are they used? Assistive Technology, 15(1), 58-68.
Ladouceur, M., & Barbeau, H. (2000). Functional electrical stimulation-assisted walking for persons with incomplete spinal injuries: Longitudinal changes in maximal overground walking speed. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 32, 28-36.
Lancioni, G. E., & Lems, S. (2001). Using a microswitch for vocalization responses with persons with multiple disabilities. Disability & Rehabilitation, 23(16), 745-748.
Lancioni, G. E., & Oliva, D. (1999). Using an orientation system for indoor travel and activity with persons with multiple disabilities. Disability & Rehabilitation, 21(3), 124-127.
Lancioni, G. E., Oliva, D., Bracalente, S., & ten Hoopen, G. (1996). Use of an acoustic orientation system for indoor travel with a spatially disabled blind man. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 90(1), 36-42.
Lancioni, G. E., Oliva, D., & Gnocchini, F. (1998). Enhancing independent indoor travel and activity in a woman with multiple disabilities through special technology. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 21(4), 409-413.
Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O'Reilly, M. F., Campodonico, F., Piazzolla, G., Scalini, L., et al. (2005). Impact of favorite stimuli autmoatically delivered on step responses of presons with multiple disabilities during their use of walker devices. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26(1), 71-76.
Lane, J. P. (1997a). Development, evaluation and marketing of assistive devices. Technology and Disability, 6(1/2), 105-125.
Lane, J. P. (1997b). Technology evaluation and transfer in the assistive technology marketplace: Terms process, and roles. Technology and Disability, 7(1,2), 5-24.
Lane, J. P. (1998). Consumer contribution to technology evaluation and transfer. Technology and Disability, 9(3), 103-118.
Lane, J. P., Usiak, D. J., & Moffat, J. A. (1996). Consumer requirements for assistive devices; informantion for product development/improvement. AZtech (Technical Report 96C3).
Lane, J. P., Usiak, D. J., Stone, V. I., & Scherer, M. J. (1997). The voice of the consumer: Consumers define the ideal battery charger. Assistive Technology, 9(2), 130-139.
Langley-Turnbaugh, S. J., Murphy, K., & Levine, E. (2004). Accommodating students with disabilities in soil science activities. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Science Education, 33, 155-160.
LaPlante, M. P., Hendershot, G. E., & Moss, A. J. (1997). The prevalence of need for assistive technology devices and home accessibility features. Technology and Disability, 6, 17-28.
Larsson, A., Nystrom, C., Vikstrom, S., Walfridsson, T., & Soderback, I. (1995). Computer-assistive cognitive rehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain damage: Four case studies. Occupational Therapy International, 2(3), 166-189.
Larsson Lund, M., & Nygård, L. (2003). Incorporating or resisting assistive devices: Different approaches to achieving a desired occupational self-image. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 23(2), 67-75.
Lasker, J. P., & Bedrosian, J. L. (2001). Promoting acceptance of augmentative and alternative communication by adults with acquired communication disorders. AAC Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17(3) , p. 141-53.
Latham, N. K., & Haley, S. M. (2003). Measuring functional outcomes across postacute care: Current challenges and future directions. Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 15(2), 83-98.
Latham, N. K., Jette, D. U., Slavin, M., Richards, L. G., Procino, A., Smout, R. J., et al. (2005). Physical therapy during stroke rehabilitation for people with different walking abilities. Archives of Physical Medecine and Rehabilitation, 86(12), S41-S50.
Lau, C., & O'Leary, S. (1993). Comparison of computer interface devices for persons with severe physical disabilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(11), 1993.
Law, M., King, G., Russell, D., Stewart, D., Hurley, P., & Bosch, E. (2001). All about outcomes: An educational program to help you understand, evaluate, and choose adult outcome measures. Thorofare: SLACK Inc.
Lehoux, P. (2004). Patient's perspectives on high-tech home care: A qualitative inquiry into the user-friendliness of four technologies. BioMed Central Health Services Research, 4(1), 28.
Leibrock, C. A., & Terry, J. E. (1999). Beautiful Universal Design: A Visual Guide. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Lemaire, E. D., Upton, D., Paialunga, J., Martel, G., & Boucher, J. (1996). Clinical analysis of a CAD/CAM system for custom seating: A comparison with hand-sculpting methods. Journal of rehabilitation research and development / Veterans Administration, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Rehabilitation R&D Service, 33(3), 311-320.
Lemke, M., Winter, M., Pizur-Barnekow, K., Mendonca, R., Schwanke, T. D., Winters, J., et al. (2005). RERC-AMI R3 Resource Document: MED-AUDIT Black Box System (BBS) Taxonomy. Available on the World Wide Web at: http://www.r2d2.uwm.edu/rerc-ami/r3resources.html.
Lemke, M., Winter, M., Pizur-Barnekow, K., Mendonca, R., Schwanke, T. D., Winters, J., et al. (2005). RERC-AMI R3 resource doucment: Expert user MED-AUDIT (Medical Equipment Device-Accessibility and Universal Design Information Tool) taxonomy., 2005, from www.r2d2.uwm.edu/rerc-ami/r3resources.html
Lenker, J. A., & Paquet, V. L. (2003). A review of conceptual models for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assistive Technology, 15(1), 1-15.
Lenker, J. A., Scherer, M. J., Fuhrer, M. J., Jutai, J. W., & DeRuyter, F. (2005). Psychometric and administrative properties of measures used in assistive technology device outcomes research.Unpublished manuscript, Buffalo.
Leplege, A., & Hunt, S. (1997). The problem of quality of life in medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(1), 47-50.
Levine, D. (Ed.). (2003). Universal Design New York 2. Buffalo, NY: IDeA Publications.
Lewis, M. S. J., & Jackson, D. W. (2001). Television literacy: Comprehension of program content using closed captions for the deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies & Deaf Education, 6(1), 43-53.
Li, Y., Bain, L., & Steinberg, A. G. (2003). Parental decision making and the choice of communication modality for the child who is deaf. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 157(2), 162-168.
Light, J. C., Binger, C., Agate, T. L., & Ramsay, K. N. (1999). Teaching partner-focused questions to individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication to enhance their communicative competence. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 241-255.
Lilja, M., Bergh, A., Johansson, L., & Nygard, L. (2003). Attitudes toward rehabilitation needs and support from assistive technology and the social environment among elderly people with disability. Occupational Therapy International, 10(1), 75-93.
Lipton Garber, S., & Gregorio, T. L. (1990). Upper extremity assistive devices: Assessment of use by spinal cord-injured patients with quadriplegia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44(2), 126-131.
Loane, T. D., & Kirby, R. L. (1986). Low anterior counterweights to improve static rear stability of occupied wheelchairs. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 67, 263-266.
Lomas, J., Pickard, L., S., B., Elbard, H., Finlayson, A., & Zoghaib, D. (1989). The Communication Effectiveness Index: Development and psychometric evaluation of functional communication for adult aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54(1), 113-124.
Long, T., Huang, L., Woodbridge, M., Woolverton, M., & Minkel, J. (2003). Integrating assistive technology into an outcome-driven model of service delivery. Infants and Young Children, 16(1), 272-283.
LoPresti, E. F., & Brienza, D. M. (2004). Adaptive software for head-operated computer controls. IEEE Transactions Neural System Rehabilitation Engineering, 12(1), 102-111.
Louise-Bender Pape, T., Kim, J., & Weiner, B. (2002). The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: A review of personal factors. Disability & Rehabilitation., 24(1/2/3), 5-20.
Luckner, J., & Denzin, P. (1998). In the mainstream: Adaptations for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. Perspectives in Education and Deafness, 17(1), 8-11.
Lund, M. L., & Nygard, L. (2003). Incorporating or resisting assistive devices: Different approaches to achieving a desired occupaqtional selfimage. Occupational Therapy Journal of Rehabilitation: Occupation, Participation, and Health,, 23(2), 67 75.
*Lund, M. L., & Nygard, L. (2003). Incorporating or resisting assistive devices: Different approaches to achieving a desired occupaqtional selfimage. Occupational Therapy Journal of Rehabilitation: Occupation, Participation, and Health,, 23(2), 67 75.
Lupton, D., & Seymour, W. (2000). Technology, selfhood and physical disability. Social Science & Medicine, 50(12), 1851-1862.
Lyman, M., & Mather, M. A. (1998). Equal learning opportunity: Assistive technolgoy for students with special needs. Technology and Learning, 19(4), 55-56,58,60.
Lysack, J. T., Wyss, U. P., & Packer, T. L. (1999). Designing appropriate rehabilitation technology: A mobility device for women with ambulatory disabilities in India. International Journal of Rehabilitation, 22, 1-9.
Maccini, P., Gagnon, J. C., & Hughes, C. A. (2002). Technology-based practices for secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25(4), 247-262.
MacMillan, B. (2002). Towards a comprehensive ebvaluation of the impact of electronic aids to daily living: Evaluation of consumer satisfaction. Disability & Rehabilitation., 24(1/2/3), 115-125.
Magnusson, L., & Hanson, E. J. (2003). Ethical issues arising from a research, technology and developmen project to support frail older people and their family carers at home. Health and Social Care in the Community, 11(5), 431-439.
Maguire, S. M., McCann, J. P., & Swallow, M. (2001). An audit of the provision of environmental control systems in Northern Ireland, 1992-1997. Clinical Rehabilitation, 15(3), 320-323.
Mahoney, J., Euhardy, R., & Carnes, M. (1992). A comparison of a two-wheeled walker and a three-wheeled walker in a geriatric population. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 40, 208-212.
Mahoney, J. E., Sager, M. A., & Jalaluddin, M. (1999). Use of an ambulation assistive device predicts functional decline associated with hospitalization. Journal of Gerontology, 54A(2), M83-M88.
Majaess, G. G., Kirby, R. L., Ackroyd-Stolarz, S. A., & Charlebois, P. B. (1993). Influence of seat position on the static and dynamic forward and rear stability of occupied wheelchairs. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 74, 977-982.
Malassigné, P., Nelson, A. L., Cors, M. W., Jensen, R. P., Amato, M., Schnurr, E., et al. (2002). Iterative design and evaluation of new prone carts for individuals with SCDs: A technical note. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 39(1), 127-139.
Mancini, M. C., Coster, W. J., Trombly, C. A., & Heeren, T. C. (2000). Predicting elementary school participation in children with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 339-347.
Mann, W. C. (1995). Rehabilitaiton engineering: The National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research focuses on assistive technology for elders. Generations, 19(1), 49 - 54.
Mann, W. C., Granger, C., Hurren, D., Tomita, M., & Charvat, B. (1995). An analysis of problems with canes encountered by elderly persons. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 13(1/2), 25-49.
Mann, W. C., Hurren, D., Karuza, J., & Bentley, D. W. (1993). Needs of home-based older visually impaired persons for assistive devices. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, April(?), 106-110.
Mann, W. C., Hurren, D., & Tomita, M. (1993). Comparison of assistive device use and needs of home-based older persons with different impairments. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(11), 980-987.
Mann, W. C., Hurren, D., & Tomita, M. (1995). Assistive devices used by home-based elderly persons with arthritis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(8), 810-820.
Mann, W. C., Hurren, D., Tomita, M., & Charvat, B. (1995). An analysis of problems with walkers encountered by elderly persons. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 13(1/2), 1-23.
Mann, W. C., Hurren, D., Tomita, M., & Charvat, B. (1995). Assistive devices for home-based older stroke survivors. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 10(3), 75-86.
Mann, W. C., Hurren, D., Tomita, M., & Charvat, B. (1996). Use of assistive devices for bathing by elderly who are not institutionalized. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 16(4), 261-286.
Mann, W. C., Hurren, D., Tomita, M., & Charvat, B. (1997). A 2-year study of coping strategies of home based frail elders with vision impairment. Technology and Disability, 6, 177-189.
Mann, W. C., Hurren, D., Tomita, M., & Charvat, B. A. (1995). A follow-up study of older stroke survivors living at home. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 11(1), 52-66.
Mann, W. C., Hurren, M. D., Charvat, B. A., & Tomita, M. R. (1996). Changes over one year in assistive device use and home modifications by home-based older persons with Alzheimer's disease. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 12(2), 9-16.
Mann, W. C., Karuza, J., Hurren, D., & Tomita, M. (1992). Assistive devices for home-based elderly persons with cognitive impairments. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 8(2), 35 - 52.
Mann, W. C., Karuza, J., Hurren, D., & Tomita, M. (1993). Needs of home-based older persons for assistive devices: The University of Buffalo Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Aging Consumer Assessments Study. Technology and Disability, 2, 1-11.
Mann, W. C., & Lane, J. P. (1991). Assistive technology for persons with disabilities: The role of occupational therapy.
Mann, W. C., Ottenbacher, K. J., Fraas, L., Tomita, M., & Granger, C. V. (1999). Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental intervention in maintaining independence and reducing home care costs for the frail elderly: a randomized control trial. Archives of Family Medicine, 8(3), 210-217.
Mann, W. C., Ottenbacher, K. J., Hurren, D., & Tomita, M. (1995). Relationship of severity of physical disability to pain, functional status, and assistive device use of home-based elderly clients. Journal of Home Health Care Practice, 8(1), 75-84.
Mann, W. C., Ottenbacher, K. J., Tomita, M. R., & Packard, S. (1994). Design of hand-held remotes for older persons with impairments. Assistive Technology, 6(2), 140-146.
Mann, W. C., & Tomita, M. (1998). Perspectives on assistive devices among elderly persons with disabilities. Technology & Disability, 9(3), 119-148.
Mann, W. C., & Tomita, M. (2000). Impact of unilateral neglect on assistive device use. Technology and Disability, 12, 53-69.
Mann, W. C., Tomita, M., Hurren, D., & Charvat, B. (1999). Changes in health, functional and psychosocial status and coping strategies of home-based older persons with arthritis over three years. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 19(2), 126-146.
Mann, W. C., Tomita, M., Packard, S., Hurren, D., & Creswell, C. (1994). The need for information on assistive devices by older persons. Assistive Technology, 6(2), 134-139.
Manton, K. G., Corder, L., & Stallard, E. (1993). Changes in the use of personal assistance and special equipment from 1982 to 1989: Results from the 1982 and 1989 NLTCS. The Gerontologist, 33(2), 168-176.
Manzke, J. M., Egan, D. H., Felix, D., & Krueger, H. (1998). What makes an automated teller machine usable by blind users? Ergonomics, 41(7), 982-999.
Martin, B., & McCormack, L. (1999). Issues surrounding assistive technology use and abandonment in an emerging technological culture. Paper presented at the Assistive Technology on the Threshold of the New Millenium [AAATE 99 conference proceedings].
Martinez, R. A. R. (2000). The effectiveness of instruction in telescope usage by adults with visual impairment. Texas Tech University Ed.D, 114(114).
Mason, C., & Webber, J. (2003). And Learning for all. Principal Leadership, 3(8), 30-33.
Mathieson, K. M., Kronenfeld, J. J., & Keith, V. M. (2002). Maintaining functional independence in elderly adults: the roles of health status and financial resources in predicting home modifications and use of mobility equipment. Gerontologist, 42(1), 24-31.
May, L. A., Butt, C., Kolbinson, K., Minor, L., & Tulloch, K. (2004). Wheelchair back-support options: Functional outcomes for persons with recent spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 1146-1150.
McAfoose, L. R. (2004). Using AAC device features to enhance teenager's quality of life. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 1(1), 33-41.
McComas, J., Kosseim, M., & Macintosh, D. (1995). Client-centered approach to develop a seating clinic satisfaction questionnaire: A qualitative study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(10), 980-985.
McCreadie, C., Seale, J., Tinker, A., & Turner-Smith, A. (2002). Older people and mobility in the home: In search of useful assistive technologies. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(2), 54-60.
McDonald, D. W., Boyle, M. A., & Schumann, T. L. (1989). Environmental control unit utilization by high-level spinal cord injured patients. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 70(8), 621-623.
McDonald, R., Surtees, R., & Wirz, S. (2003). A comparison between parents' and therapists' views of their child's individual seating stystems. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 26(3), 235-243.
McGeorge, D. W. F. (1994). Assessing consumer satisfaction with a service. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(8), 290 - 293.
McGrath, P. J., Goodman, J. T., Cunningham, S. J., MacDonald, B., Nichols, T. A., & Unruh, A. (1985). Assistive devices: Utilization by children. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 66(7), 430-432.
McHaney, R., Hightower, R. & Pearson, J. (2002). A validation of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument in Taiwan. Information & Management, 39, 503-511.
McHenry, E. (2002). The digital revolution's new bounty: Technology can now tailor lessons to every classroom learner. HSGE News, Spring.
McNaughton, D., Hughes, C., & Clark, K. (1997). The effect of five proofreading conditions on the spelling performance of college students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilites, 30(6), 643-651.
Medley, A., & Thompson, M. (1997). The effect of assistive devices on the performance of community dwelling elderly on the Timed Up and Go Test. Issues on Aging, 20(1), 3-7.
Melis, E., Torres-Moreno, R., Barbeau, H., & Lemaire, E. D. (1999). Analysis of assisted-gait chaacteristics in persons with incompletee spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 37(6), 430-439.
Melis, E. H., Torres-Moreno, R., Barbeau, H., & Lemaire, E. D. (1999). Analysis of assisited-gait characteristics in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 37(6), 430-439.
Mendelsohn, S. (1991). Advocacy, funding, and legislation: Technology issues for the 1990s. Technology and Disability, 1(1), 55-68.
Mendelsohn, S., Smith, R. O., & Schwanke, T. D. (2004). Technical report – Town hall meeting on legal issues involved in measuring assistive technology outcomes (1.0), from http://www.uwm.edu/CHS/r2d2/atoms/archive/technicalreports/fieldscans/tr-th-legal.html
Mendelsohn, S. B., Schwanke, T. D., & Smith, R. O. (2004, June 22). Overview of legal issues in assistive technology outcomes measurement. Paper presented at the Presented at the RESNA 27th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice, and Policy, Orlando, FL.
Mendelson, L., Heller, T., & Factor, A. (1995). The transition from nursing homes to community living for people with developmental disabilities: An assessment of the assistive technology needs and usage. Technology and Disability, 4, 261-267.
Mendelson, L. S. (1997). The impact of assistive technology use: Data summary and final report. (No. H133B30072).
Mendonca, R. (2005). Assessing the usability and the reliability of MED-AUDIT. Paper presented at the the 29th Annual Great Lakes Biomedical Conference, Biomedical Informatics: Applications, Achievements, and Frontiers: The Milwaukee Chapter of IEEE EMBS.
Mendonca, R. (2005). RERC-AMI R3 Resource Document: Measuring accessible medical instrumentation, annotated bibliography, 2005, from www.r2d2/uwm.edu/rerc-ami/r3resources.html
Mendonca, R., & Smith, R. O. (2006). MED-AUDIT (Medical Equipment Device-Accessibility and Universal Design Information Tool): Usability analysis. Poster presented at the RESNA 29th International Conference on Thriving in Challenging Times: The Future of Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology.
Merbitz, C. (1996). Frequency measures of behavior for assistive technology and rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 8(2), 121-130.
Merbitz, C., Morris, J., & Grip, J. C. (1989). Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 70, 308-312.
Merians, A. S., D, J., Boian, R., Tremaine, M., Burdea, G. C., Adamovich, S. V., et al. (2002). Virtual reality-augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke. Physical Therapy, 82(9), 898-915.
Messecar, D. C. (2000). Factors affecting caregivers' ability to make environmental modifications. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 26(12), 32 - 42.
Messecar, D. C., Archbold, P. G., Stewart, B. J., & Kirschling, J. (2002). Home environmental modification strategies used by caregivers of elders. Research in Nursing and Health, 25, 357-370.
Meyer, A., & O'Neill, L. M. (2000). Beyond access: Universal design for learning. Exceptional Parent, 30(3), 59-61.
Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2000). Universal design for individual differences. Education Leadership, 58(3), 39-43.
Meyer, C., & Shipham, E. (1995). The appropriateness of assistive devices for people with physical disability. The South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 25(1), 36-42.
Meyers, A. R., & Andresen, E. M. (2000). Enabling our instruments: Accommodation, universal design, and access to participation in research. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 81(2), S5-S9.
Meyers, A. R., Andresen, E. M., & Hagglund, K. J. (2000). A model of outcomes research: Spinal cord Injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, S81-S90.
Miglietta, M. A., Bochicchio, G., & Scalea, T. M. (2004). Computer-assisted communication for critically ill patients: A pilot study. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 57(3), 488-493.
Mihailidis, A., Fernie, G. R., & Cleghorn, W. L. (2000). The development of a computerized cueing device to help people with dementia to be more independent. Technology & Disability, 13(1), 23-40.
Milczarek, J. J., Kirby, R. L., Harrison, E. R., & MacLeod, D. A. (1993). Standard and four-footed canes: Their effect on the standing balance of patients with hemiparesis. Archives of Physical Medecine and Rehabilitation, 74, 281-285.
Miles-Tapping, C. (1996). Power wheelchairs and independent life styles. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 10(2), 137-145.
Miller, F., Fee, J., & James, W. (2005). Investigation of the dynamic of spasticity in children with cerebral palsy: A final report.
Mills, T., Holm, M. B., Trefler, E., Schmeler, M., Fitzgerald, S., & Boninger, M. Development of an outcome measure tool for wheelchair seating and mobility interventions: A work in progress. Unpublished report.
Mills, T., Holm, M. B., Trefler, E., Schmeler, M., Fitzgerald, S., & Boninger, M. (2002). Development and consumer validation of the Functional Evaluation in a Wheelchair (FEW) instrument. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1/2/3), 38-46.
Milone Jr., M. N. (1997). Technology for everyone: Assistive devices for students with special needs. Technology and Learning, 17(5), 44-49.
Minkel, J. L. (1996). Assistive technology and outcome measurement: Where do we begin? Technology and Disability, 5, 285-288.
Mitchell, T., & Cusick, A. (1998). Evaluation of a client-centered paediatric rehabilitation programme using goal attainment scaling. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 45, 7-17.
Moore, A., McQuay, H., & Gray, J. A. M. E. (1995). Evidence-based everything. Bandolier, 1(12), 1.
Moore, P. V., & Flynn, J. B. (1984). Users of coin-operated computerized sphygmomanometry and reasons for utilization: a descriptive study. American Journal of Public Health, 74(4), 368-370.
Mortola, P. J., Kohn, J., LeBlanc, M., & McNeal, D. R. (1994). Implementation and follow-up of rehabilitation technology. Rehabilitation R&D Reports.
Morvan, J., Guichard, J., & Torossian, V. (1997). Technical aids for the physically handicapped: A psychological study of the master robot. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 20(2), 193-197.
Moser, C. S. (2004). The 1994 and 1995 NHIS Phase II Disability Followback Survey - Child Questionnaire: A critical analysis of the data relating to AT and its implications for future AT survery reserach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Moser, C. S. (2004). Technical report - Database analysis:1994 and 1995 NHIS Phase II Disability Followback Survey, Child Questionnaire (1.0), from http://www.uwm.edu/CHS/r2d2/atoms/archive/technicalreports/tr-nhisd.pdf
Moser, C. S. (2004). Technical report - The inclusion of assistive technology outcomes in current health and rehabilitation outcome measures (1.0). Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.uwm.edu/CHS/atoms/archive/technicalreports/tr-nhisd.pdf.
Moss, A. B. (1992). Are the elderly safe at home? Journal of Community Health Nursing, 9(1), 13-19.
Mueller, J. (1995). The case for universal design: If you can't use it, it's just art. Ageing International, 19 - 23.
Mueller, J. L. (1998). Assistive technology and universal design in the workplace. Assistive Technology, 10(1), 37 - 43.
Mulholland, S. J., Packer, T. L., Laschinger, S. J., Lysack, J. T., Wyss, U. P., & Balaram, S. (2000). Evaluating a new mobility device: Feedback from women with disabilities in India. Disability & Rehabilitation, 22(3), 111-122.
Mulley, G. (1990). Everyday aids and appliances: Walking frames. British Medical Journal, 300, 925-927.
Mulley, G. P. (1988). Everyday aids and appliances: Walking sticks. British Medical Journal, 296, 475-476.
Murphy, J., Markova, I., Collins, S., & Moodie, E. (1996). AAC systems: Obstacles to effective use. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 31, 31-44.
Murphy, P. (2004). The augmentative and alternative communication olympics: Raising and showcasing communication competencies. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 1(1), 16-20.
Murphy, S., & Tickle-Degnen, L. (2001). The effectiveness of occupational therapy-related treatments for persons with Parkinson's disease: A meta-analytic review. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(4).
Nagaoka, H., Kurokawa, T., & Pauly, M. E. (1997). Rehabilitation in practice. Work environment of blind computer specialists in Japan. Disability & Rehabilitation, 19(7), 293-296.
Nagi, S. Z. (1969). Disability and rehabilitation: Legal, clinical, and self-concepts and measurement. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Nagi, S. Z. (1991). Disability concepts revisited: Implications for prevention. In A. M. Popel & A. R. Tarlov (Eds.), Disability in america: Toward a national agenda for prevention (pp. 309-327). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nas, T. F. (1996). Cost-benefit analysis: Theory and application. London: Sage Publications, Inc.
National Institutes of Health.CRISP - Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects. Retrieved May, 2002, from http://crisp.cit.nih.gov/
National Rehabilitation Hospital & ECRI. (1992). Independence in the bathroom. In Request evaluating assistive technology. Washington, DC: Author.
National Rehabilitation Information Center. NIDRR program directory. Retrieved May, 2002, from http://www.naric.com/search/pd/
Neilson, A., Bardsley, G. I., Rowley, D. I., Hogg, J., Malek, M., Morrison, G. C., et al. (2001). Measuring the effects of seating on people with profound and multiple disabilities -- a preliminary study. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 38(2), 201-214.
Nelson, A., Malassigne, P., Amerson, T., Saltzstein, R., & Binard, J. (1993). Descriptive study of bowel care practices and equipment in spinal cord injury. SCI nursing : a publication of the American Association of Spinal Cord Injury Nurses, 10(2), 65-67.
Nelson, D. L., & Schau, E. M. (1997). Effects of a standing table on work productivity and posture in an adult with developmental disabilities. Work: a Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 9(1), 13-20.
Neville-Jan, A., Piersol, C. V., Kielhofner, G., & Davis, K. (1993). Adaptive equipment: A study of utilization after hospital discharge. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 8(4), 3-18.
Newton, A. M., Kirby, R. L., MacPhee, A. H., Dupuis, D. J., & MacLeod, D. A. (2001 (in press)). Evaluation of manual wheelchair skills: Is objective testing necessary or would subjective estimates suffice? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
Noakes, A. (n.d.). AT & employment: Community research for AT focus group results. Retrieved February 11, 2004, from http://www.atnet.org/CR4AT/FocusGroup/EmploymentThematic.html
Nochajski, S. M., Tomita, M. R., & Mann, W. C. (1996). The use and satisfaction with assistive devices by older persons with cognitive impairments: a pilot intervention study. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 12(2), 40-53.
Nocon, A., & Qureshi, H. (1996). Outcomes of community care for users and carers: A social services perspective. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Noll, Schwartz, & Canfield. (1999). Assistive technology protocol for transition planning: Cooperative Educational Service Agency (CESA) #11, Wisconsin.
Noll, A. (2005, June 25). Vocational rehabilitation counselors and assistive technology. Paper presented at the the RESNA 28th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice, and Policy, Atlanta, GA.
Noll, A., & Schwanke, T. D. (2006, June 22-26). Vocational rehabilitation counselors perception of role and competencies in assistive technology. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the RESNA 29th International Conference on Thriving in Challenging Times: The Future of Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology, Atlanta, GA.
Nordenskiöld, U. (1994). Evaluation of assistive devices after a course in joint protection. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 10(2), 293-304.
Nordenskiöld, U. (1997). Daily activities in women with rheumatoid arthritis: Aspects of patient education, assistive devices and methods for disability and impairment assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine Supplementum, 37, 9-71.
Nordenskiöld, U., Grimby, G., & Dahlin-Ivanoff, S. (1998). Questionnaire to evaluate the effects of assistive devices and altered working methods in women with rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical Rheumatology, 17, 6-16.
Nordenskiöld, U., Grimby, G., Hedberg, M., Wright, B., & Linacre, J. M. (1996). The structure of an instrument for assessing the effects of assistive devices and altered working methods in women with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care and Research, 9(5), 358-367.
Norris, A. (1999). Occupational Therapy: A pilot study of an outcome measure in palliative care. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 5(1), 40-45.
Nosek, M. A., & Krouskop, T. A. (1995). Demonstrating a model approach to independent living center-based assistive technology services. Assistive Technology, 7(1), 48-54.
Noyes, J. (2002). Barriers that delay children and young people who are dependent on mechanical ventilators from being discharged from hospital. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 11, 2 - 11.
Ofiesh, N. S., Rice, C. J., Long, E. M., Merchant, D. C., & Gajar, A. H. (2002). Service delivery for postsecondary students iwth disabilities: a survey of assistive technology use across disabilities. College Student Journal, 36(1).
Ofiesh, N. S., Rice, C. J., Long, E. M., Merchant, D. C., & Gajar, A. H. (2002). Service delivery for postsecondary students with disabilities: A survey of assistive technology use across disabilities. College Student Journal, 36(1).
Okada, S., & Kume, Y. (1999). CCTV user survey and prototypes based on the survey results. Technology & Disability, 11(3), 123-131.
Oldridge, N. B. (1996). Outcomes measurement: Health state preferences and economic evaluation. Assistive Technology, 8(2), 94-102.
Oldridge, N. B. (1996). Outcomes measurement: Health-related quality of life. Assistive Technology, 8(2), 82-93.
Oliveira-Cruz, V., Hanson, K., & Mills, A. (2003). Approaches to overcoming constraints to effective health service delivery: A review of the evidence. Journal of International Development, 15, 41-65.
Olson, C. H. (2006). Taxonomy for classifying writing devices used by students with learning disabilities. Proceedings of the RESNA 29th International Conference on Thriving in Challenging Times: The Future of Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology.
O'Neill, L. M. (2000). Seeing past a child's disability: One parent's view of universal design for learning. The Exceptional Parent, 30(11), 26-32.
O'Neill, L. M. (2001). Helping teachers and parents find accessible electronic learning materials for students with disabilities. The Exceptional Parent, 31(9), 56-59.
O'Neill, L. M., & Dalton, B. (2002). Thinking readers part II: Supporting beginning reading in children with cognitive diabilitis through technology. The Exceptional Parent, 32(6), 40-43.
Oortwijn, W., & van Beekum, T. (1997). Cost-effective rehabilitation technology through appropriate indicators: Experiences from validation. CERTAIN deliverable 4.2. Leiden, The Netherlands: TNO Prevention and Health, Technology in Health Care.
Opara, C. U., Levangie, P. K., & Nelson, D. L. Effects of selected assistive devices on normal distance gait characteristics. Physical Therapy, 65(8), 1188-1191.
Oravec, J. (2002). Virtually accessible: Empowering students to advocate for accessibility and support universal design. Library Hi Tech, 20(4), 452-461.
Ores, L., & Parent, L. H. (1984). Telephone call aid for problems of visual sequencing. AJOT American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 38(1), 40-43.
Orkwis, R., & McLane, K. (1998). A curriculum every student can use: Design principles for student acess., 2-21.
Ormerod, T. C., Richardson, J., & Shepherd, A. (1998). Enhancing the usability of a task analysis method: A notation and environment for requirements specification. Ergonomics, 41(11), 1642-1663.
Orwig, A. H. (1997). Integrating technology: The challenge and the promise. Technology & Learning, 38-43.
Ottenbacher, K. J., & Cusick, A. (1990). Goal attainment scaling as a method of clinical service evaluation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44(6), 519-525.
Ottenbacher, K. J., & Cusick, A. (1993). Discriminative versus evaluative assessment: Some observations on goal attainment scaling. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(4), 349-354.
Ottenbacher, K. J., & Hinderer, S. R. (2001). Evidence-based practice: Methods to evaluate individual patient improvement. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80(10), 786-796.
Ottenbacher, K. J., Smith, P. M., Illig, S. B., Linn, R. T., Ostir, G. V., & Granger, C. V. (2004). Trends in length of stay, living setting, functional outcome, and mortality following medical rehabilitation. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(14), 1687-1695.
Ottenbacher, K. J., & Tomchek, S. D. (1993). Reliability analysis in therapeutic research: Practice and procedures. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(1), 10-16.
Pain, H., Ballinger, C., Gore, S., & McLellan, D. L. (1994). An evaluation of kettle tippers. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(1), 5-8.
Palmer, C. V. (1993). Assistive devices: Identification, selection, and evaluation. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 9(2), 39-58.
Pardo, R. D., Deathe, A. B., & Winter, D. A. (1993). Walker user risk index: A method for quantifying stability in walker users. American Journal of Physcial Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72`(5), 301-305.
Parette, H., & VanBiervliet, A. (1992). Tentative findings of a study of the technology needs and use patterns of persons with mental retardation. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 36, 7-27.
Parette, H. P., & Angelo, D. H. (1996). Augmentative and alternative communication impact on families: Trends and future directions. Journal of Special Education, 30(1), 77-99.
Parette, H. P., & Dempsy Marr, D. (1997). Assisting children and families who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) Devices: Best practices for school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 34(4), 337-346.
Parette, H. P., & VanBiervliet, A. (1991). Rehabilitation assistive technology issues for infants and young children with disabilities: A preliminary examination. Journal of Rehabilitation, July/August/September, 27-36.
Parette, J., Howard, P., & Brotherson, M. J. (1996). Family-centered assistive technology assessment. Intervention in School and Clinic, 32(1), 1053-4512.
Parette, P., & Dikter, D. (2004). Outcomes and benefits: Challenges in the assistive technology field. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 1(1), 6-7.
Parker, M. G., & Thorslund, M. (1991). The use of technical aids among community-based elderly. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(8), 712-718.
Patel, R., Pilato, S., & Roy, D. (2004). Beyond linear syntax: An image-oriented communication aid. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 1(1), 57-66.
Pedrotty Bryant, D., & Bryant, B. R. (2003). Assistive technology for people with disabilities. Boston: Pearson Education.
Pell, S. D., Gillies, R. M., & Carss, M. (1997). Relationship between use of technology and employment rates for people with physical disabilities in Australia: implications for education and training programmes. Disability & Rehabilitation, 19(8), 332-338.
Penning, M. J., & Strain, L. A. (1994). Gender differences in disability, assistance, and subjective well-being in later life. Journal of Gerontology, 49(4), S202-207.
Perks, B. A., Mackintosh, R., & Stewart, C. P. U. (1994). Re: A survey of marginal wheelchair users. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development / Veterans Administration, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Rehabilitation R&D Service, 32(2), 297-302.
Persson, J., & Brodin, H. (1995). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of assistive technologies. In I. P. Porrero & R. P. de la Bellacasa (Eds.), The European context for assistive technology. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Persson, J., & Brodin, H. (1995). Prototype tool for assistive technology cost and utility evaluation: CERTAIN.
Persson, J., Hellbom, G., Oberg, B., van Beekum, T., Oortwijn, W., Brodin, H., et al. (2000). Final report. DE3101 EATS: Efficiency of assistive technology and services: CMT, Linkoping University.
Peters, B. (2001). Driving performance and workload assessment of drivers with tetraplegia: An adaptation evaluation framework. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 38(2), 215-224.
Peterson, M. J. (1998). Universal kitchen and bathroom planning: Design that adapts to people. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Petty, L. (1999). Computer access evaluation and quantitative measurement. Technology Special Interest Section Newsletter, 9, 1-4.
Petty, L. S., & Treviranus, M. A. (2000). Outcome measures for high technology vision aids: An application of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Paper presented at the Vision Quest 2000: 11th World Congress of Retina International, Toronto, Canada.
Pezzin, L. E., Dillingham, T. R., MacKenzie, E. J., Ephraim, P., & Rossbach, P. (2004). Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 723-729.
Phillips, B., & Zhao, H. (1993). Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology, 5(1), 36-45.
Physicians, A. A. o. F. (2000). Mnemonic devices. Retrieved October 8, 2002, from www.findarticles.com
Pinnington, L. L., & Hegarty, J. R. (1994). Preliminary findings on the everyday use of a robotic aid to eating. Clinical Rehabilitation, 8(3), 258-265.
Pippin, K., & Fernie, G. R. (1997). Designing devices that are acceptable to the frail elderly: A new understanding based upon how older people perceive a walker. Technology & Disability, 7(1/2), 93-102.
Pisha, B., & Coyne, P. (2001). Smart from the start: The promise of universal design for learning. Remedial and Special Education, 22(4), 197-203.
Pizur-Barnekow, K., Lemke, M. R., Smith, R. O., Winter, M., & Mendonca, R. (2005, June 26). Measuring accessibility and universal design of medical devices: The medical equipment device - accessibility and universal design tool (MED-AUDIT). Paper presented at the the RESNA 28th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice, and Policy, Atlanta, GA.
Pizur-Barnekow, K., Lemmke, M. R., Smith, R. O., Winter, M., & Mendonca, R. (2005). Measuring accessibility and universal design of medical devices: The medical equipment device-accessibility and universal design information tool (MED-AUDIT). Proceedings of the RESNA 28th International Conference in Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice, and Policy.
Polaschek, N. (2003). The experience of living on dialysis: a literature review. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 30(3), 303-313.
Post, K. M. (1993). Educating consumers about assistive technology. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(11), 1046-1047.
Post, M. W., W., v. A. F., van Dijk, A. J., & Schrijvers, A. J. (1997). Services for spinal cord injured: availablity and satisfaction. Spinal Cord, 35, 109-115.
Post, M. W. M., van Asbeck, F. W. A., van Dijk, A. J., & Schrijvers, A. J. P. (1997). Services for spinal cord injured: Availability and satisfaction. Spinal Cord, 35, 109-115.
Poulson, D., & Richardson, S. (1998). USERfit - a framework for user centered design in assisitve technology. Technology and Disability, 9(3), 163-171.
Prangrat, T., Mann, W. C., & Tomita, M. (2000). Impact of unilateral neglect on assistive device use. Technology and Disability, 12, 53-69.
Preiser, W. F. E., & Ostroff, E. (Eds.). (2001). Universal design handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pressman, H., & Blackstone, S. W. (Eds.). (1996). Alliance '96 portfolio: Outcomes measurement in assistive technology. Monterey CA: Augmentative Communication Inc.
Price, L., Field, S., & Patton, J.R. (2003). Adults with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24(6), 322-382.
Priest, N., & May, E. (2001). Laptop computers and children with disabilities: Factors influencing success. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 48, 11-23.
Pritham, C. H. (1996). Guest editorial: Quality improvement process/outcomes research. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 33(3), vii - viii.
Pruitt, S. D., Varni, J. W., Seid, M., & Setoguchi, Y. (1997). Prosthesis satisfaction outcome measurement in pediatric limb deficiency. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 750-754.
Pruslow, J. (2000). A comparison of the costs and educational outcomes of three models of service delivery for special needs students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Punch, J. L., Robb, R., & Shovels, A. H. (1994). Aided listener preferences in laboratory versus real-world environments. Ear and Hearing, 15(1), 50-61.
Raskind, M. H., Goldberg, R. J., Higgins, E. L., & Herman, K. L. (1999). Patterns of change and predictors of success in individuals with learning disabilities: Results from a twenty-year longitudinal study. Learning Disability Research and Practice, 14(1), 35-49.
Raskind, M. H., & Higgins, E. (1995). Effects of speech synthesis on the proofreading efficiency of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 141-158.
Raskind, M. H., & Higgins, E. L. (1995). Reflections on ethics, technology and learning disabilities: Avoiding the consequences of ill-considered action. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(7), 425-439.
Rath, K. A., & Royer, J. M. (2002). The nature and effectiveness of learning disability services for college students. Educational Psychology Review, 14(4), 353-381.
Reed, B. J., Fried, J. H., & Rhoades, B. J. (1995). Empowerment and assistive tecnology: The local resource team model. Journal of Rehabilitation, April/May/June, 30-35.
Reed, M. (n.d.). Assistive technology and rural communities: Community research for assistive technology focus group results. Retrieved February 11, 2004, from http://www.atnet.org/CR4AT/FocusGroup/RuralThematic.html
Reed, M. (n.d.). AT & ethnic minority populations: Community research for assistive technology focus group results. Retrieved February 11, 2004, from http://www.atnet.org/CR4AT/FocusGroup/EthnicThematic.htm
Reed, M. (n.d.). AT & the aging population: Community research for assistive technology focus group results. Retrieved February 11, 2004, from http://www.atnet.org/CR4AT/FocusGroup/AgingThematic.html
Reed, P. (1999). Improving assistive technology services in your school district: What to do, where to begin. Closing the Gap, 18(5), 1, 17, 22-25.
Reed, P., & Bowser, G. (1999). Assistive technology and the IDEA. Exceptional Parent, 29(11), 54-55,57-58.
Reiber, G. E., Smith, D. G., Boone, D. A., Del Aguila, M., Borchers, R. E., Mathews, D., et al. (1997). Design and pilot testing of the DVA/Seattle Footwear System for diabetic patients with foot insensitivity. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 34(1), 1-8.
Reid, D., Laliberte-Rudman, D., & Hebert, D. (2002). Impact of wheeled seated mobility devices on adult users' and their caregivers' occupational performance: A critical literature review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(5), 261-280.
Reid, D., Rigby, P., & Ryan, S. (1999). Functional impact of a rigid pelvic stabilizer on children with cerebral palsy who use wheelchairs: users' and caregivers' perceptions. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 3, 101-108.
Rein, J. (1988). Technology to assist physical function and aid independent living for children 0 to 21. In Proceedings of ICAART 88, the 1988 RESNA Conference, Washington, DC: RESNA.
Reinking, D. (1986). Integrating graphic aids into content area instruction: The graphic information lesson. Journal of Reading, 30(2), 146-151.
Reinking, D. (1992). Differences between electronic and printed texts: An agenda for research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1(1), 11-24.
Research evidence of the benefits of the Natural-Fit handrim. (2004). Three Rivers Holdings, LLC.
Research Triangle Institute. (2000). National classification system for assistive technology devices and services. Washington, DC: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
RESNA. (1998). Volume I: RESNA resource guide for assistive technology outcomes: Measurement tools. Arlington, VA: Author.
RESNA. (1998). Volume II: RESNA resource guide for assistive technology outcomes: Assessment instruments, tools, & checklists from the field. Arlington, VA: Author.
RESNA. (1998). Volume III: RESNA resource guide for assistive technology outcomes: Developing domains of need and criteria of services. Arlington, VA: Author.
RESNA Resource Guide for Assistive Technology Outcomes: Assessment Instruments, Tools, and Checklists from the Field. (Vol. 2)(1998). Arlington, VA: RESNA.
RESNA Resource Guide for Assistive Technology Outcomes: Developing Domains of Need and Criteria of Services. (Vol. 3)(1998). Arlington, VA: RESNA.
RESNA Resource Guide for Assistive Technology Outcomes: Measurement Tools. (Vol. 1)(1998). Arlington, VA: RESNA.
Riemer-Reiss, M. L., & Wacker, R. R. (2000). Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 66(3), 44-50.
Rigby, P., Ryan, S., From, W., Walczak, E., & Jutai, J. (1996). A client-centred approach to developing assistive technology with children. Occupational Therapy International, 3(1), 67-79.
Riley, J. K. (2000). Innovation station. Assistive technology and spinal cord injury. SCI Nursing, 17(4) , p. 179-80.
Riva, G. (2000). Virtual reality in rehabilitation of spinal cord injuries: A case report. Rehabilitation Psychology, 45(1), 81-88.
Robertson, S. C., & Colborn, A. P. (2000). Can we improve outcomes research by expanding research methods? The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54(5), 541-543.
Robertson, S. C. C., A.P. (1997). Outcomes research for rehabilitation: Issues and Solutions. Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes Measurements, 1(5), 15.-23.
Roblyer, M. D., & Edyburn, D. L. (2006). Technology in special education. In M. D. Roblyer (Ed.), Integrating educational technology into teaching (Vol. 4th ed., pp. 407-424). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Rodgers, B. L. (1984). The holistic application of high technology for conversation, writing, and computer access aid systems. Discovery or Technology for Disabled Persons, 165-175.
Rodgers, B. L. (1985). A holistic perspective: An introduction. A future perspective on the holistic use of technology for people with disabilities. Madison, WI: Trace Research & Development Center.
Rodriguez-Ascaso, A., Villalar, J. L., Arredondo, M. T., Valles, M., & Cabrera, M. F. (2002). An assistive home care environment for people with special needs. Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 8 Suppl 2, 72-74.
Roelands, M., Van Oost, P., Buysse, A., & Depoorter, A. (2002). Awareness among community-dwelling elderly of assistive devices for mobility and self-care and attitudes towards their use. Social Science & Medicine., 54(9), 1441-1451.
Roelands, M., Van Oost, P., Depoorter, A., & Buysse, A. (2002). A social-cognitive model to predict the use of assistive devices for mobility and self-care in elderly people. Gerontologist, 42(1), 39-50.
Rogers, J. C., & Holm, M. B. (1992). Assistive technology device use in patients with rheumatic disease: A literature review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 120-127.
Rogers, J. C., Holm, M. B., & Perkins, L. (2002). Trajectory of assistive device usage and user and non-user characteristics: Long-handled bath sponge. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 47(6), 645-650.
Rose, D. H. (2001). Universal design for learning: Associate editor column. Journal of Special Education, 15(2), 1-8.
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2000). Universal design for individual differences. Educational Leadership, 58(3), 39-43.
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(1), 67-70.
Rose, D. H., Meyer, A., Rappolt, G., & Strangman, N. M. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Press.
Rose, D. H., Sethuraman, S., & Meo, G. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Science Education Technology, 15(2), 56-60.
Rose, F. D., Brooks, B. M., & Attree, E. A. (2002). An exploratory investigation into the usability and usefulness of training people with learning disabilities in a virtual environment. Disability & Rehabilitation, 24(11-12), 626-633.
Rostron, A., Plant, R., & Hermann, C. (1994). Hypermedia for the learning-disabled - expensive luxury or useful tool. Computers & Education, 22(3), 215-223.
Rousseau, A., McCrae, C., & Van Hoogstraten, A. (1992). The use and misuse of upper limb protheses in the Western Cape. The South African Jounal of Occupational Therapy, 22(2), 15-22.
Routhier, F., Vincent, C., Desrosiers, J., & Nadeau, S. (2003). Mobility of wheelchair users: A proposed performance assessment framework. Disability & Rehabilitation., 25(1), 19-34.
Routhier, F., Vincent, C., Morissette, M. J., & Desaulniers, L. (2001). Clinical results of an investigation of paediatric upper limb myoelectric prothesis fitting at the Quebec Rehabilitation Institute. Prosthetics & Orthotics International, 25(2), 119-131.
Routhier, F., Vincent, C., Morissette, M.-J., & Desaulniers, L. (2001). Clinical results of an investigation of paediatric upper limb myoelectric prosthesis fitting at the Quebec Rehabilitation Institute. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 25, 119-131.
Rusconi, S., & Turner-Stokes, L. (2003). An evaluation of aftercare following discharge from a specialist in-patient rehabilitation service. Disability and rehabilitation, 25(22), 1281-1288.
Rush, K. L., & Ouellet, L. L. (1997). Mobility aids and the elderly client. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 7-15.
Russell, J. N., Hendershot, G. E., LeClere, F., Howie, L. J., & Adler, M. (1997). Trends and differential use of assistive technology devices: United States, 1994. Advance Data, 292, 1-9.
Rust, K., Blaser, R., Fonner, K., Smith, R. O., Brayton, A., & Januik, M. (2005). Technical report - Assistive technology instrument update and review (Version 1.0). Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.uwm.edu/CHS/r2d2/atoms/archive/technicalreports/fieldscans/tr-fs-ati.html.
Rust, K. L., Blaser, R., Fonner, K., Smith, R. O., Brayton, A., & Januik, M. (2005). ID-AT - Assessments (Information Database of Assistive Technology Assessments), Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www3.uwm.edu/CHS/r2d2/atoms/idata/.
Rust, K. L., & Smith, R. O. (1992). Use of functional outcome measures to assess covariate dimensions of function. The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, confronting our future, Chicago, IL [Abstract]. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73(October), 982.
Rust, K. L., & Smith, R. O. (2003, June). Outcome data needs for assistive technology research and development. Paper presented at the RESNA 26th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice and Policy, Atlanta, GA.
Rust, K. L., & Smith, R. O. (2003, June). Treatment of assistive technology interventions in health and rehabilitation outcome assessments. Paper presented at the RESNA 26th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice and Policy, Atlanta, GA.
Rust, K. L., & Smith, R. O. (2004). AT assessments: A practical experience and implications on outcomes. Instructional course presented at the RESNA 27th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Reserach, Design, Practice, and Policy, Orlando, FL.
Rust, K. L., & Smith, R. O. (2004). Do functional assessments obtain good evidence when they ignore assistive technology? Poster presented at the American Occupational Therapy Association Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
Rust, K. L., & Smith, R. O. (2004, June 21). Satisfaction with assistive technology: What are we measuring? Paper presented at the the RESNA 27th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice, and Policy, Orlando, FL.
Rust, K. L., & Smith, R. O. (2004). Technical report - Outcome measures used in AT research & development (1.0). Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.uwm.edu/CHS/atoms/archive/technicalreports/fieldscans/tr-atproddev.pdf.
Rust, K. L., & Smith, R. O. (2004). Technical report - The inclusion of assistive technology outcomes in current health and rehabilitation outcome measures (1.0), from http://www.uwm.edu/CHS/r2d2/atoms/archive/technicalreports/fieldscans/tr-instruments.pdf
Rust, K. L., & Smith, R. O. (2005). Assistive technology in the measurement of rehabilitation and health outcomes: A review and analysis of instruments. American Journal of Physcial Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(10), 780-793.
Ryan, D. M. (1998). A newly designed postoperative ischial weight-bearing proximal contact lower-limb prosthesis. International Journal of Rehabilitation & Health, 4(4), 253-257.
Ryan, S., Rigby, P., & From, W. (1996). Understanding the product needs of consumers of assistive devices. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 9(2), 129-135.
Ryan, S., Snider-Riczker, P., & Rigby, P. (2005). Community-based performance of a pelvic stabilization device for children with spasticity. Assistive Technology, 17(1), 37-46.
Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current directions in psychological science, 4(4), 991-1104.
Samuelsson, K., Larsson, H., Thyberg, M., & Gerdle, B. (2001). Wheelchair seating intervention. Results from a client-centred approach. Disability and rehabilitation, 23(15), 677-682.
Sanford, J. A., Arch, M., & Megrew, M. B. (1995). An evaluation of grab bars to meet the needs of elderly people. Assistive Technology, 7(1), 36-47.
Sanford, J. A., Story, M. F., & Ringholz, D. (1998). Consumer participation to inform universal design. Technology and Disability, 9(3), 149-162.
Saunders, G. H., & Jutai, J. W. (2004). Hearing specific and generic measures of the psychosocial impact of hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 15(3), 238-248.
Sawyer, S., & Southwick, R. (2002). Temporal issues in information and communication technology-enabled organizational change: Evidence from an enterprise systems implementation. The Information Society, 18, 263-280.
Sax, C., Fisher, D., & Pumpian, I. (1996). Outcomes for students with severe disabilities: Case studies on the use of assistive technology in inclusive classrooms. Technology and Disability, 5(3,4), 327-334.
Sax, C. L. (2002). Assistive technology education: An online model for rehabilitation professionals. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1/2/3), 144-151.
Saxena, S., Nikolic, S., & Popovic, D. (1995). An EMG-controlled grasping system for tetraplegics. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 32(1), 17-24.
Schacter, J., & Fagnano, C. (1999). Does computer technology improve student learning and achievement? How, when, and under what conditions? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(4), 329-343.
Schellingerhout, R., Bongers, R. M., van Grinsven, R., Smitsman, A. W., & Van Galen, G. P. (2001). Improving obstacle detection by redesign of walking canes for blind persons. Ergonomics, 44(5), 513-526.
Schemm, R., & Gitlin, L. (1988). How occupational therapists teach older patients to use bathing and dressing devices in rehabilitation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(4), 276-282.
Scherer, M. (1993). What we know about women's technology, use, avoidance, and abandonment. Women and Therapy, 14(3-4), 117-132.
Scherer, M., & Glueckauf, R. (2005). Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for activities and participation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50(2), 132-141.
Scherer, M., & McKee, B. (1990). The assistive technology device predisposition assessment. Communication Outlook, 12(1), 23-27.
Scherer, M., Smith, R. O., Jutai, J., & Edyburn, D. L. (2003, June 21). Assistive technology outcomes: What does it mean to all of us? Paper presented at the Presented at the RESNA 26th Annual Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice, and Policy, Atlanta, GA.
Scherer, M. J. (1990). Assistive device utilization and quality of life in adults with spinal cord injuries or cerebral palsy two years later. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 21, 36-44.
Scherer, M. J. (1994). Matching people with technology. Rehabilitation Management, 7(2), 128-130.
Scherer, M. J. (1996). Introduction to outcomes measurement. Technology and Disability, 5, 283-284.
Scherer, M. J. (1996). Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. Disability and Rehabilitation, 18(9), 439-448.
Scherer, M. J. (1997). A functional approach to technological factors and their assessment in rehabilitation. In S. S. Dittmar & G. E. Gresham (Eds.), Functional Assessment and Outcome Measures for the Rehabilitation Health Professional (pp. 69-88). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
Scherer, M. J. (1998). The impact of assistive technology on the lives of people with disabilities. In D. B. Gray, L. A. Quatrano & M. L. Lieberman (Eds.), Designing and using assistive technology: The human perspective. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks.
Scherer, M. J. (2000). Living in the state of stuck: How technology impacts
the lives of people with disabilities, third edition. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Scherer, M. J. (2001). The changing focus of AT...assistive technology. Rehab Management International, 11(1), 38-39.
Scherer, M. J., & Coombs, F. K. (2003, in press). Ethical issues in the evaluation and selection of assistive technology: RESNA.
Scherer, M. J., & Craddock, G. (2002). Matching Person & Technology (MPT) assessment process. Technology & Disability, 14, 125-131.
Scherer, M. J., & Cushman, L. A. (2000). Predicting satisfaction with assistive technology for a sample of adults with new spinal cord injuries. Psychological reports, 87(3 Pt 1), 981-987.
Scherer, M. J., & Cushman, L. A. (2000). Predicting satisfaction with assistive technology for a sample of adults with new spinal cord injuries.
Scherer, M. J., & Cushman, L. A. (2001). Measuring subjective quality of life following spinal cord injury: A validation study of the assistive technology device predisposition assessment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23(9), 387-393.
Scherer, M. J., & Cushman, L. A. (2002). Determining the content for an interactive training programme and interpretive guidelines for the Assistive Technology Device Predispostion Assessment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1), 126-130.
Scherer, M. J., & Frisina, D. R. (1998). Characteristics associated with marginal hearing loss and subjective well-being among a sample of older adults. Journal of rehabilitation research and development / Veterans Administration, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Rehabilitation R&D Service, 35(4), 420-426.
Scherer, M. J., & Galvin, J. C. (1997). Outcomes and assistive technology: Matching the right person with the right technology, then measuring the result. REHAB management, February/March, 103-105.
Scherer, M. J., & Lane, J. P. (1997). Assessing consumer profiles of 'ideal' assistive technology in ten categories: An integration of quantitative and qualitative methods. Disability and Rehabilitation, 19(12), 528-535.
Schiller, M. (1998). Linking outcomes research, education, and practice. Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes Measure, 2(6), 1-8.
Schlosser, R. W. (2002). On the importance of being earnest about treatment integrity. AAC Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 36-44.
Schlund, M. W. P., G. (1998). An individualized rehabilitation outcome planning and outcome measurement methodology. Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes Measurements, 2(4), 1-9.
Schluntz, R. (1993). The emergence of design review boards. Planning for higher education, 21, 7-14.
Schminky, M. M., & Baran, J. B. (1999). Central auditory processing disorders an overview of assessment and management practices. Deaf-Blind Perspectives, 7(1), 1-16.
Schroeder, S., & Steinfeld, E. (1979). The estimated cost of accessible buildings / prepared for U.S. Department of Housing and Urban and Development. Washingtion: The Office.
Schulze, L. J. H., Ramos, M. H., & Tetrick, L. (2001). Effectiveness of arm supports during typing for adults with neurological disorders. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 11(4), 235-253.
Schwanke, T. D., & Smith, R. O. (2004). Introduction to assistive technology data in the RSA-911 case service report for application to assistive technology outcomes measurement. Proceedings of the RESNA 27th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice, and Policy, Orlando, FL.
Schwanke, T. D., & Smith, R. O. (2004). Technical report - Clinical service programs databases (1.0). Retrieved from the World WIde Web: http://www.uwm.edu/CHS/r2d2/atoms/archive/technicalreports/tr-clinicaldb.pdf.
Schwanke, T. D., & Smith, R. O. (2004). Technical report - Vocational rehabilitation database analysis: RSA-911 case service report and database linking (1.0). University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.uwm.edu/CHS/atoms/archive/technicalreports/tr-rsa911.pdf.
Schwanke, T. D., & Smith, R. O. (2005). Assistive technology outcomes in work settings. WORK: Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 24(2).
Schwanke, T. D., & Smith, R. O. (2006). The Milwaukee Idea Home (MIH) - accessibility, affordability, and environmental friendliness in a small floor plan. Paper presented at the the International Conference on Aging, Disability, and Independence (ICADI), St. Petersburg, FL.
Schwanke, T. D., Smith, R. O., & Edyburn, D. (2000, April 3). Applying the A3 accessibility model in education through OT and engineering. Paper presented at the AOTA 80th Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington.
Schwanke, T. D., Smith, R. O., & Edyburn, D. (2001, June 24). A3 model diagram developed as accessibility and universal design instructional tool. In RESNA 24th Annual Conference. Reno, Nevada.
Schwanke, T. D., Smith, R. O., & Edyburn, D. L. (2001, June22-26). A3 model diagram developed as accessibility and universal design instructional tool. Paper presented at the The AT Odyssey Continues, Reno, Nevada.
Schwanke, T. D., Smith, R. O., & Edyburn, D. L. (2002). Project IMPACT post-secondary accessibility discoveries. RESNA 25th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice and Policy, 210-212.
Schweitzer, J. A., Mann, W. C., Nochajski, S., & Tomita, M. (1999). Patterns of engagement in leisure activity by older adults using assistive devices. Technology and Disability, 11, 103-117.
Scott, S. S., & Gregg, N. (2000). Meeting the evolving education needs of faculty in providing access for college students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(2), 158-167.
Seelman, K. (1999). Aging with a disability: Views from the national institute on disability and rehabilitation research. Assistive Technology, 11, 84-87.
Seeman, T. E., Berkman, L. F., Charpentier, P. A., Blazer, D. G., Albert, M. S., & Tinetti, M. E. (1995). Behavioral and psychosocial predictors of physical performance: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Journal of Gerontology, 50(4), M177-183.
Seeman, T. E., Charpentier, P. A., Berkman, L. F., Tinetti, M. E., Guralnik, J. M., Albert, M., et al. (1994). Predicting changesin physical performance in a high-functioning elderly cohort: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Journal of Gerontology, 49(3), M97-108.
Seplowitz, C. (1984). Technology and occupational therapy in the rehabilitation of the bedridden quadriplegic. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 38(11), 743-747.
Shaw, S. F., Scott, S.F., & McGuire, J.M. (2001). Teaching college students with learning disabilities. ERIC Digest.
Shepherd, C., & Ruzicka, S. (1991). Tendonesis brace use by persons with spinal cord injuries. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(1), 81-83.
Shields, R. K., & Dudley-Javoroski, S. (2005). Monitoring standing wheelchair use after spinal cord injury: a case report. Disabil Rehabil, 27(3), 142-146.
Shipman, I. (1987). Bath aids -- their use by a multidiagnostic group of patients. International Rehabilitation Medicine, 4, 182-184.
Shone, S. M., Ryan, S., Rigby, P. J., & Jutai, J. W. (2002). Toward a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of electronic aids to daily living: Evaluation of consumer satisfaction. Disability and rehabilitation, 24(1-3), 115-125.
Shone Stickel, M., Ryan, S., Rigby, P. J., & Jutai, J. W. (2002). Toward a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of electronic aids to daily living: evaluation of consumer satisfaction. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1/3), 115-125.
Shull, J., Deitz, J., Billingsley, F., Wendel, S., & Kartin, D. (2004). Assistive technology programming for a young child with profound disabilities: A single-subject study. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 24(4), 47-62.
Shumway-Cook, A., Baldwin, M., Polissar, N. L., & Gruber, W. (1997). Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults. Physical Therapy, 77(8), 812-819.
Silverman, M. (1999). Interpretation of the school function assessment for use as an assistive technology outcome measure. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI.
Silverman, M., Smith, R. O., Edyburn, D., & Taylor, D. (1998, 10/3/98). Project OATS: Understanding the impact of assistive technology in the schools. Paper presented at the Soaring Into A Grand Millenium, Milwaukee, WI.
Silverman, M. K., Smith, R. O., Edyburn, D., & Taylor, D. (1999). Assistive technology outcomes in the schools: Identifying a valid measure. Proceedings of the RESNA Annual Conference, Arlington, VA.
Silverman, M. K., Stratman, K. F., & Smith, R. O. (2000). Measuring assistive technology outcomes in schools using functional assessment. Diagnostique, 25(4), 307-326.
Silverman, M. K., Toonen, M., Freiberg, K., McElwee, M., & Smith, R. O. (1999). Identifying assistive technology outcomes measures in the schools: Comparison of instruments. Milwaukee, WI:: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Simmerman, S., & Swanson, H. L. (2001). Treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: How important are internal and external validity? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(3), 221-236.
Sindhu, B. (2002, March 7). The impact of providing design information to help make websites more accessible: An investigation of the consequential validity of the WebAUDIT. Paper presented at the Presented at the 16th Annual Occupational Therapy Midwest Deans' Research Conference, Omaha, NE.
Sindhu, B., Smith, R. O., & Schwanke, T. D. (2002). Measuring consequential validity of an assessment instrument using human judgment. RESNA 25th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice and Policy, 242-244.
Sinnott, K. A., Dunn, J. A., & Rothwell, A. G. (2004). Use of the ICF conceptual framework to interpret hand function outcomes following tendon transfer surgery for tetraplegia. Spinal Cord, 42, 396-400.
Small, L. M., & Grose, J. (1993). A cultural perspective on rehabilitation and modality use with elder persons -- a pilot study. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 11(3), 71-80.
Smidt, G. L., & Mommens, M. A. (1980). System of reporting and comparing influence of ambulatory aids on gait. Physical Therapy, 60(5), 551-558.
Smith, D. (1998). The right to technology under the law of special education: Advocacy tips, special education basics, and assistive technology specifics. Paper presented at the CSUN, Lansing, MI.
Smith, J., & Topping, M. (1996). The introduction of a robotic aid to drawing into a school for physically handicapped children: A case study. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(12), 565-569.
Smith, M., & Sainfort, P. (1989). A balance theory of job design for stress reduction. Int J Industrial Ergonomics, 4, 67-79.
Smith, R. (1988). Quality assurance in equipment for the spinal cord-injured client. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42(1), 36-39.
Smith, R. (1992). Technology education from an occupational therapy view. Technology and Disability, 1(3), 22-30.
Smith, R. (1995). A client-centered model for equipment prescription: Client's values and roles, effective use of adaptive equipment. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 9(4), 39-52.
Smith, R. (1998). Accountability in assistive technology interventions-measuring outcomes. RESNA Resource Guide for Assistive Technology Outcomes: Measurement Tools, 1, 14-42.
Smith, R., Edyburn, D., Silverman, M., Grogan, K., Fonner, K., Taylor, D., et al. (2000). Executive summary and final report: Project OATS: Outcomes of assistive technology in the schools. Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Smith, R. O. (1991). Technological approaches to performance enhancement. In C. Baum & C. Christiansen (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Overcoming human performance deficits (pp. 747-786). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
Smith, R. O. (1993). Assessing the impact of assistive technology using OT FACT version 2.0. Proceedings of the 16th Annual RESNA Conference, Arlington, VA.
Smith, R. O. (1993). Computer-assisted functional assessment and documentation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(11), 988-992.
Smith, R. O. (1996). Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology: Challenge and innovation. Assistive Technology, 8(2), 71-81.
Smith, R. O. (1998). Accountability in assistive technology interventions: Measuring outcomes. In RESNA resource guide for assistive technology outcomes: Measurement tools (Vol. 1, pp. 60-67). Arlington, VA: RESNA.
Smith, R. O. (1998). Accountability in assistive technology interventions-measuring outcomes. RESNA Resource Guide for Assistive Technology Outcomes: Measurement Tools,, 1,, 14-42.
Smith, R. O. (2000). Measuring assistive technology outcomes in education. Diagnostique, 25(4), 273-290.
Smith, R. O. (2001). Research over the next century: Impact of technology. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(2), 233-234.
Smith, R. O. (2002). Assistive technology outcome assessment prototypes: Measuring "ingo" variables of "outcomes". Paper presented at the RESNA 25th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice and Policy.
Smith, R. O. (2002). OTFACT: Multi-level performance-oriented software with an assistive technology outcomes assessment protocol. Technology and Disability, 14, 133 - 139.
Smith, R. O. (2004, June 19-22). Assistive Technology Outcomes Measurement System (ATOMS) Project: Needs assessment. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the RESNA 27th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice, and Policy, Orlando, FL.
Smith, R. O. (2004, September 29). Selecting an outcomes measurement methodology that isolates AT from other interventions. Paper presented at the Presented at A Roadmap for Assistive Technology to Improve Community Participation by People with Disabilities, St. Louis, MO.
Smith, R. O., & Barris, R. (1985). Comprehensive functional assessment: Strategy and framework [Abstract]. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 66.
Smith, R. O., & Benge, M. (2004). Using assistive technologies to enable self care and daily living. In In C. Christiansen (3rd ed.), Ways of Living: Self-Care Management for People with Special Needs. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc.
Smith, R. O., Benge, M., & Hall, M. (1994). Technology for self care. In C. Christiansen (Ed.), Ways of living: Self care strategies for special needs (pp. 379-422). Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
Smith, R. O., Christiaansen, R., Borden, B., Lindberg, D., Gunderson, J., & Vanderheiden, G. (1989). Effectiveness of a writing system using a computerized long-range optical pointer and 10-branch abbreviation expansion. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 26(1), 51-62.
Smith, R. O., Edyburn, D., & Silverman, M. K. (1999). Using the AAA Model for performing accessibility audits. Proceedings of the RESNA Annual Conference, Arlington, VA.
Smith, R. O., Mendelsohn, S., & Schwanke, T. D. (2003, June 22). Town hall on legal issues in AT outcomes measurement. Paper presented at the Presented at the RESNA 26th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice, and Policy, Atlanta, GA.
Smith, R. O., Mendelson, S., & Schwanke, T. (2003). Town hall meeting on legal issues in AT outcomes. Paper presented at the 26th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice and Policy, Atlanta, GA.
Smith, R. O., Muhlenhaupt, M., & DuBois, S. A. (1993). AOTA self study series: Classroom appplications for school-based practice (Vol. 8). Rockville, MD: AOTA, Inc.
Smith, R. O., Pizur-Barnekow, K., & Rust, K. L. (2005, June 23). Missing in action: Products and technology for medical services. Paper presented at the the 11th Annual NACC Conference on ICF: Mapping the Clinical World to ICF, Rochester, MN.
Smith, R. O., & Rust, K. L. (2004). Assistive technology outcomes: A review of the field. Poster presented at the American Occupational Therapy Association Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
Smith, R. O., & Rust, K. L. (2004). ATOMS Project 2002-2003: Assumptions, projects & discoveries, from http://www.uwm.edu/CHS/r2d2/atoms/archive/assumptdiscov.html
Smith, R. O., & Rust, K. L. (2005, June 22). Matching assistive technology interventions to the ICF. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Conference on ICF: Mapping the Clinical World to ICF, Rochester, MN.
Smith, R. O., Rust, K. L., Lauer, A., & Boodey, E. (2004). Technical report - History of assistive technology outcomes (1.0). Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.uwm.edu/CHS/atoms/archive/technicalreports/fieldscans/tr-fs-history.html.
Smith, R. O., & Sainfort, P. C. (1989). A balance theory of job design for stress reduction. International Journal of Industrial Economics, 4, 67-79.
Smith, R. O., & Scherer, M. (1998). Where are we headed with assistive technology outcomes? In L. Vitaliti (Ed.), Volume 1 - RESNA resource guide for assistive technology outcomes: measurement tools. Arlington, VA: RESNA Press.
Smith, R. O., Schwanke, T. D., & Rust, K. L. (2006). ATOMS project summary of findings: Needs assessment of AT outcomes and directions for the future. Workshop session at the RESNA 29th International Conference on Thriving in Challenging Times: The Future of Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology, Atlanta, GA.
Soderholm, S., Meinander, M., & Alaranta, H. (2001). Augmentative and alternative communication methods in locked-in syndrome. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 33(5), 235-239.
Sohlberg, M. M., Fickas, S., Ehlhardt, L., & Todis, B. (2005). The longitudinal effects of accessible email for individuals with severe cognitive impairments. Aphasiology, 19(7), 651-681.
Sonn, U. (1996). Longitudinal studies of dependence in daily life activities among elderly persons. Scan J Rehab Med Suppl, 34, 2-34.
Sonn, U., Davegardh, H., Lindskog, A. C., & Steen, B. (1996). The use and effectiveness of assistive devices in an elderly urban population. Aging (Milano), 8(3), 176-183.
Spicer, J., Schmidt, D., & Pinnington, L. L. (2005). Evaluation of text telephones designed for people with impaired hearing or speech. J Med Eng Technol, 29(3), 137-144.
Sprigle, S., & Harris, F. (2004). Technical report - Comparison of cost outcome methods (1.0), from http://www.uwm.edu/CHS/r2d2/atoms/archive/technicalreports/fieldscans/tr-cost.html
Steele, R. D., Goodrich, G. L., Hennies, D., & McKinley, J. A. (1989). Reading aid technology for blind persons: Responses to a questionnaire of experienced users. Assistive Technology, 1, 23-30.
Steg, D. R., Vaidya, S., & Hamdan, P. F. (1983). Long term gains from early intervention through technology: An eleven year report. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 11(3), 203-214.
Steinfeld, A. (1998). The benefit of real-time captioning in a mainstream classroom as measured by working memory. Volta Review, 100(1), 29-44.
Steinfeld, E. (1979). Access to the built environment: A review of literature. Washington: The Office.
Steinfeld, E. (1979). Accessible buildings for people with walking and reaching limitations / prepared for U.S. Department of Housing and Urban and Development. Washington: The Office.
Steinfeld, E. (1979). Selected bibliography on barrier-free design / prepared for U.S. Department of Housing and Urban and Development. Washingtion: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
Steinfeld, E., & Danford, G. S. (Eds.). (1999). Enabling environments: Measuring the impact of environment on disability and rehabilitation. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Steinfeld, E., & Danford, G. S. (Eds.). (1999). Measuring enabling environments: Measuring the impact of environment on disability and rehabilitation. New York: Kluwe Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Steinfeld, E., Schroeder, S., & Bishop, M. (1979). Adaptable dwellings / prepared for U.S. department of housing and urban and development. Washington: The Office.
Stelmack, J. (2001). Quality of life of low-vision patients and outcomes of low-vision rehabilitation. Optometry and Vision Science, 78(5), 335-342.
Steultjens, E. M. J., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., Jellema, S., Bakker, E. B., & van den Ende, C. H. M. (2004). Occupational therapy for community dwelling elderly people: A systematic review. Age & Ageing, 33(5), 453-460.
Stickel, M. S., Ryan, S., Rigby, P. J., & Jutai, J. W. (2002). Toward a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of electronic aids to daily living: evaluation of consumer satisfaction. Disability & Rehabilitation, 24(1/3), 115-125.
Stineman, M. (2002.). Assistive technology outcomes: Commodity or a therapy? American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation., 81(8,), 636-637.
Stineman, M. G. (2001). Defining the population, treatments and outcomes of interest: Reconciling the rules of biology with meaningfulness. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80(2), 147-159.
Stone, J., Mann, W., Mann, J., & Hurren, D. (1997). Use of magnifiers by older persons with low vision. Technology & Disability, 6(3), 169-175.
Stone, V. I., Bauer, S. M., Lane, J. P., Usiak, D. J., Khan, Z., & Prabhu, C. (1998). Wheelchair tie-downs: Ideal features and existing products. Technology & Disability, 8(3), 159-178.
Story, M. F., & Mueller, J. L. (1998). Measuring usability: The principles of universal design. Paper presented at the Designing for the 21st Century.
Stowe, J. (1979). Aids -- who uses them? British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 168-169.
Stratman, K. (1999). Examination of the task supports section of the school function assessment as a measurement of assistive technology outcomes. Unpublished master's, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI.
Sun, J. (2000). How do we know it's working? Learning & Leading with Technology, 27(7), 32-35, 41,49.
Sutherland, A., & Chesson, R. (1994). The needs of physically disabled people aged 16-65 years and service usage in Grampian. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(5), 171-176.
Suzuki, K. M., & Lockette, G. (2000). Client satisfaction survey of a wheelchair seating clinic. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 17(2), 55-65.
Suzuki, K. M. L., G. (2000). Client satisfaction survey of a wheelchair seating clinic. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 17(2), 55-65.
Suzuki, R., Ogawa, M., Otake, S., Izutsu, T., Tobimatsu, Y., Izumi, S. I., et al. (2004). Analysis of activities of daily living in elderly people living alone: Single-subject feasibility study. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health, 10(2), 260-276.
Sweeney, G. M., Catchpool, N., & Clarke, A. K. (1994). Choosing lever taps for people with rheumatoid arthritis. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(7), 263-265.
Szeto, A. Y. J., & White, R. N. (1983). Evaluation of a curb-climbing aid for manual wheelchairs: Considerations of stability, effort, and safety. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 20(1), 45-56.
Szlyk, J. P., Seiple, W., Laderman, D. J., Kelsch, R., Stelmack, J., & McMahon, T. (2000). Measuring the effectiveness of bioptic telescopes for persons with central vision loss. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 37(1), 101-108.
Tam, C., Reid, D., Naumann, S., & O'Keefe, B. (2000). Evaluating use of word prediction with children with spina bifida. Paper presented at the The Tri-joint Congress 2000, "Forging Ahead Together", Toronto, ON.
Tam, C., Reid, D., Naumann, S., & O'Keefe, B. (2002). Perceived benefits of word predictio intervention on written productivity in children with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Occupational Therapy International, 9(3), 237-255.
Tam, C., Reid, D., Naumann, S., & O'Keefe, B. (2002). Perceived benefits of word prediction intervention on written productivity in children with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Occupational Therapy International, 9(3), 237-255.
Tamazawa, Y., Watanabe, M., Kikuchi, M., Takatsu, M., Tamazawa, K., Yumoto, N., et al. (2004). A new dental unit for both patients in wheelchairs and general patients. Gerodontology, 21(1), 53-59.
Taugher, M. (2004). Technical Report - Focus groups on assistive technology use and outcomes: A consumer perspective (1.0), from http://www.uwm.edu/CHS/r2d2/atoms/archive/technicalreports/tr-consumerfg.pdf
Taugher, M. P. (2003). Available information and outcomes of assistive technology: A consumer perspective focus group. Proceedings of the RESNA 26th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice and Policy.
Tauke, B., Story, M.F., & Ostroff, E. (2004). Good, better, best: Using universal design and digital technology to develop great products. The Technology Teacher, 63(8), 13-15.
Taylor, P., Esnouf, J., & Hobby, J. (2001). Pattern of use and user satisfaction of Neuro Control Freehand system. Spinal Cord, 39(3), 156-160.
Taylor-Wade, J., & Smith, R. O. (2006, June 22-26). Assistive technology program viability. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the RESNA 29th International Conference on Thriving in Challenging Times: The Future of Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology.
The QIAT Consortium Leadership Team. (2000). Quality indicator for assistive technology services in school settings. Journal of Special Edcuaiton Technology, 15(4), [Online] Available: http://jset.unlv.edu.
Thoren-Jonsson, A. L., & Grimby, G. (2001). Ability and perceived difficulty in daily activities in people with poliomyelitis sequelae. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 33(1), 4-11.
Thornely, G., Chamberlain, M. A., & Wright, V. (1977). Evaluation of aids and equipment for the bath and toilet. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 243-246.
Thorslund, M., & Warneryd, B. (1990). Surveying the elderly about health, medical care and living conditions: Some issues of response inconsistency. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 11, 161-173.
Tobias, J. (1997). Universal design applied to business practices. Technology and Disability, 7(1,2), 63-71.
Todis, B. (1996). Tools for the task? Perspectives on assistive technology in educational settings. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13(1), 49-61.
Tomita, M., Mann, W. C., & Welch, T. R. (2001). Use of assistive devices to address hearing impairment by older persons with disabilities. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 24(4), 279-289.
Tomita, M. R., Mann, W. C., Fraas, L. F., & Burns, L. L. (1997). Racial differences of frail elders in assitive technology. Assistive Technology, 9(2), 140-151.
Topo, P., Jylhä, M., & Laine, J. (2002). Can the telephone-using abilities of people with dementia be promoted? An evaluation of a simple-to-use telephone. Technology and Disability, 14(1), 3-13.
Trachtman, L. (1996). Outcome measures. Are we ready to answer the tough questions? Assistive Technology, 6(2), 91-92.
Trail, M., Nelson, N., Van, J. N., Appel, S. H., & Lai, E. C. (2001). Wheelchair use by patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A survey of user characteristics and selection preferences. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82(1), 98-102.
Trefler, E., Fitzgerald, S. G., Hobson, D. A., Bursick, T., & Joseph, R. (2004). Outcomes of wheelchair systems intervention with residents of long-term care facilities. Assistive Technology, 16(1), 18-27.
Trieb, K., Lang, T., Stulnig, T., & Kickinger, W. (1999). Silicone soft socket system: its effect on the rehabilitation of geriatric patients with transfemoral amputations. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 80(5), 522-525.
Triolo, R., Nathan, R., Handa, Y., Keith, M., Betz, R. R., Carroll, S., et al. (1996). Challenges to clinical deployment of upper limb neuroprostheses. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 33(2), 111-122.
Turpin, G., Armstrong, J., Frost, P., Fine, B., Ward, C., & Pinnington, L. (2005). Evaluation of alternative computer input devices used by people with disabilities. J Med Eng Technol, 29(3), 119-129.
Tyson, R., & Strong, J. (1990). Adaptive equipment: its effectiveness for people with chronic lower back pain. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 10(2), 111-121.
Ummat, S., & Kirby, R. L. (1994). Nonfatal wheelchair-related accidents reported to the national electronic injury surveillance system. American Journal of Physcial Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73(3), 163-167.
US Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry Security. (2003). Technology assessment of the U.S. assistive technology industry, from http://www.bis.doc.gov/defenseindustrialbaseprograms/OSIES/DefMarketResearchRpts/assisttechrept/index.htm
Van der Loos, H. F. M., & Hammel, J. (1996). Engineering reasonable accomodation: The delivery and use of assistive technology in a vocational training program. Technology & Disability, 5, 371-382.
van Roosmalen, L., Bertocci, G. E., Hobson, D. A., & Karg, P. (2002). Preliminary evaluation of wheelchair occupant restraint system usage in motor vehicles. Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, 39(1), 83-93.
van Roosmalen, L., Reed, M. P., & Bertocci, G. E. (2005). Pilot study of safety belt usability for vehicle occupants seated in wheelchairs. Assistive Technology, 17(1), 23-26.
Vanderheiden, G. (1987). Service delivery mechanisms in rehabilitation technology. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41(11), 703-710.
Verbrugge, L. M., Rennert, C., & Madans, J. H. (1997). The great efficacy of personal and equipment assistance in reducing disability. American Journal of Public Health, 87(3), 384-392.
Verburg, G., Kwee, H., Wisaksana, A., Cheetham, A., & van Woerden, J. (1996). Manus: The evolution of an assistive technology. Technology and Disability, 5, 217-228.
Vernardakis, N., Stephanidis, C., & Akoumianakis, D. (1994). Rehabilitation technology product taxonomy: A conceptual tool for analysing products and extracting demand determinants. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 17, 201-214.
Versfeld, N. J., Festen, J. M., & Houtgast, T. (1999). Preference judgments of artificial processed and hearing-aid transduced speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(3 Pt 1), 1566-1578.
Vincent, C. D., L. (2002). Electirc beds: Recommendations based on users' satisfaction. OT Now, 11-14.
Vincent, C. D., L. (2002). Electric beds : recommendations based on users' satisfaction. OT Now, 11-14.
Vrklhan, B., & Miller-Polgar, J. (2001). Meaning of occupational engagement in life-threatening illness: A qualitative pilot project. The Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(4), 237-.
Wager, W., Heye, P. F., & Tsai, C. (1996). Technology needs assessment in higher education. Media Review, 9-24.
Wallace, J. F., Hayes, M. & Bailey, M.N. (2000). Assistive technology loan financing: A status of program impact and consumer satisfaction. Technology and Disability, 13, 17-22.
Walls, R. T., & Batiste, L. C. (1996). Job accommodations for fatique in the workplace. Technology and Disability, 5, 335 - 343.
Walters, J. (2000). Postsecondary education and individuals with disabilities: Recommendations to New York state for strategies to increase access and opportunity. Report of the task force on postsecondary education and disabilities with comments from the expert panel, presidents' panel, regional public forums and task force steering committee. Albany: New York State Education Department.
Ward, J., Rogers, N., Brown, R., Jeffries, G., & Wright, D. (1996). Techniques for the measurement of the human body and its actions: Application to design for physically disabled people. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences, 9(2), 34 - 45.
Warren, C. G. (1993). Cost effectiveness and efficiency in assistive technology service delivery. Assistive Technology, 5(2), 61-65.
Waters, R. L., Yakura, J. S., Adkins, R., & Barnes, G. (1989). Determinants of gait performance following spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 70(12), 811-818.
Watson, D. E. (2000). Evaluating Costs and Outcomes: Demonstrating the Value of Rehabilitation Services. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
Watts, J. H., Clement, D. G., & Casanova, J. S. (1999). Perspectives on outcomes research and practice collection. Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes Measure, 3(4), 22-32.
Watts, J. H., Erickson, A. E., Houde, L., Wilson, E., & Maynard, M. (1996). Assistive device use among the elderly: A national data-based study. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 14(1), 1-18.
Watzke, J. R. (1997). Older adults' responses to an automated integrated environmental control device: The case of the Remote Gateway. Technology & Disability, 7(1/2), 103-114.
Watzke, J. R., & Kemp, B. J. (1992). Safety for older adults: The role of technology and the home environment. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 7(4), 9-21.
Weber, A. (1998). Credentialing in assistive technology. Technology & Disability, 9, 59-63.
Wehmeyer, M. L. (1999). Assistive technology and students with mental retardation: Utilization and barriers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 1, 48-58.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Lance, G. D., & Bashinski, S. (2002). Promoting access to the general curriculum for students with mental retardation: A multi-level model. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37(3), 223-234.
Weiss-Lambrou, R., Demers, L., Tremblay, C., Ska, B., Lacoste, M., & Dansereau, J. (1997). In QUEST of user satisfaction with assistive technology devices. In G. Anogianakis, C. Buhler & M. Soede (Eds.), Advancement of Assistive Technology, Assistive Technology Research Series (Vol. 3, pp. 428-431). Washington DC: IOS Press.
Weiss-Lambrou, R., Tremblay, C., LeBlanc, R., Lacoste, M., & Dansereau, J. (1999). Wheelchair seating aids: How satisfied are consumers? Assistive Technology, 11, 43-53.
Werner, R. A., Waring, W., & Maynard, F. (1992). Osteoarthritis of the hand and wrist in the post poliomyelitis population. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 73(11), 1069-1072.
Wessels, R. D., de Witte, L. P., Weiss-Lambrou, R., Demers, L., & Wijlhuizen, G. (1998, June 23-28, 1998). A Dutch version of QUEST (D-QUEST) applied as routine follow-up within the service delivery process. Paper presented at the 3rd TIDE Congress, Helsinki, Finland.
Wessels, R. D., Willems, C. G., & de Witte, L. P. (1996). How to select a method to evaluate usability of assistive devices. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences, 9, 53-57.
Whiteneck, G. G. (1994). Measuring what matters: Key rehabilitation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 75, 1073 - 1076.
Whiteneck, G. G. (2000). Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors, Version 1. Instrument and scoring manual. Englewood, CO: Craig Hospital.
Whitenenck, G. G., Charlifue, S. W., Gerhart, K. A., Overholser, J. D., & Richardson, G. N. (1992). Quantifying handicap: A new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73(6), 519-526.
Whyte, F. (2002). Assistive Technology Device Use Inventory: the need and the development of a conceptual model. Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Milwaukee.
Whyte, F. L., Smith, R. O., Fennema-Jansen, S. A., & Edyburn, D. L. (2003). Assistive Technology Device Use Inventory: The need and development of a conceptual model. Proceeding of the RESNA 26th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice, and Policy.
Whyte, J. (2001). Building a program of outcomes research: Personal reflections. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80(11), 865-874.
Wilber, S. T., Burger, B., Gerson, L. W., & Blanda, M. (2005). Reclining chairs reduce pain from gurneys in older emergency department patients: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med, 11(8), 547-554.
Wilkins, S., Jung, B., Wishart, L., Edwards, M., & Norton, S. G. (2003). The effectiveness of community-based occupational therapy education and functional training programs for older adults: a critical literature review. The Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(4), 214-225.
Willer, B., Ottenbacher, K. J., & Coad, M. L. (1994). The community integration questionnaire. American Journal of Physcial Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73(2), 103-111.
Willson, J., Torry, M. R., Decker, M. J., Kernozek, T., & Steadman, J. R. (2000). Effects of walking poles on lower extremity gait mechanics. Official Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine.
Wilson, S., Binion, M., Smith, R. O., Fennema-Jansen, S. A., & Edyburn, D. L. (2003). Launching a large scale assistive technology service delivery and outcome tracking sysytem in the public schools. Paper presented at the Presented at the RESNA 26th International Conference on Technology and Disability: Research, Design, Practice, and Policy.
Windham, P. (1998). Access to education. Visions, 14-20.
Wojcik, B. W., Peterson-Karlan, G., Watts, E. H., & Parette, P. (2004). Assistive technology outcomes in a teacher education curriculum. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 1(1), 21-32.
Wolffe, K. E. (2003). Wired to work: An analysis of access technology training for people with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, October, 633-666.
Wolfson, A. M., Doctor, J. N., & Burns, S. P. (2000). Clinician judgments of functional outcomes: How bias and perceived accuracy affect rating. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 1567 - 1574.
Wong, C. K., & Wade, C. K. (1995). Reducing iliotibial band contractures in patients with muscular dystrophy using custom dry floatation cushions. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 76(7), 695-700.
Woodward, J., & Rieth, H. (1997). A historical review of technology research in special education. Review of Educational Research, 67, 503-536.
World Health Organization. (1977). International Classification of Diseases: Manual of the international statistical classification of diseases, injuries, and causes of death. (9th ed. Vol. 1 & 2): Geneva: World Health Organization.
World Health Organization. (1980). International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps: A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva: World Health Organization.
World Health Organization. (1997). ICIDH-2: International classification of impairments, activities and participation. A manual of dimensions of disablement and functioning. Beta-1 draft for field trial. Geneva: World Health Organization.
World Health Organization. (1999). International classification of functioning and disability : ICIDH-2. (Beta-2 draft : short version, July 1999 ed.).
World Health Organization. (2001). ICIDH-2: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health : ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: author.
World Health Organization. (2001a). International classification of functioning, disability and health : ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: author.
World Health Organization. (2001b). International classification of functioning, disability and health : ICF short version. Geneva, Switzerland: author.
Wretstrand, A., Petzall, J., & Stahl, A. (2004). Safety as perceived by wheelchair-seated passengers in special transportation services. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(1), 3-11.
Wright, F. V., Belbin, G., Slack, M., & Jutai, J. (1999). An evaluation of the David Hart Walker Orthosis: a new assistive device for children with cerebral palsy. Physiotherapy Canada, 51(4), 280-291.
Wright, J. G., & Young, N. L. (1997). The Patient-specific Index: Asking patients what they want. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American, 79A(7), 974-983.
Wu, T. F., Wang, H. P., Che, M. C., & Wu, W. T. (2004). Computer access for persons with spinal cord injury. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs: Proceedings (Vol. 3118, pp. 865-872).
Wu, T. F., Wang, H. P., Che, M. C., & Wu, W. T. (2004). Computer access for persons with spinal cord injury. Computers Helping People with Special Needs: Proceedings, 3118, 865-872.
Wuolle, K. S., Van Doren, C. L., Bryden, A. M., Peckham, P. H., Keith, M. W., Kilgore, K. L., et al. (1999). Satisfaction with and usage of a hand neuroprosthesis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80(2), 206-213.
Yang, J., Mann, W. C., Nochajski, S., & Tomita, M. R. (1997). Use of assistive devices among elders with cognitive impairment: A follow-up study. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 13(2), 13-31.
Yassi, A., Cooper, J. E., Tate, R. B., Gerlach, S., Muir, M., Trottier, J., et al. (2001). A randomized controlled trial to prevent patient lift and transfer injuries of health care workers. Spine, 26(16), 1739-1746.
Yong, L. (1996). Applying task analysis in design specifications: Current problems and a solution. Journal of Human Ergology, 25(1), 72-86.
York, J. (1989). Mobility methods selected for use in home and community environments. Physical Therapy, 69(9), 736-747.
Youdelman, K., & Messerly, C. (1996). Computer-assisted notetaking for mainstreamed hearing-impaired students. Volta Review, 98(4), 191-199.
Yuen, H. K. (1993). Improved productivity through purposeful use of additional template for a woman with cortical blindness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(2), 105-110.
Zabala, J. (March 2-4, 1995). The SETT framework: Critical areas to consider when making informed assistive technology decisions. Paper presented at the Florida Assistive Technology Impact Conference and Technology and Media Division of Council of Exceptional Children, Orlando, FL.
Zambone, A. M., & Snyder, G. R. (1991). Technology for very young children with visual impairment: An overview of applications and uses. Technology & Disability, 1(1), 25-35.
Zimmer, Z., & Chappell, N. L. (1994). Mobility restriction and the use of devices among seniors. Journal of Aging & Health, 6(2), 185-208.
Zlataric, D., K. & Celebic, A. (2001). Treatment outcomes with removable partial dentures: A comparison between patient and prosthodontist assessments. The International Journal of Prosthodont, 14(5), 423-426.